Madras High Court
Social Security and PensionsAdministrative and Public Law

Interest on delayed gratuity must follow Rule 45(A), not judicially enhanced rates.

The Government of Tamil Nadu, vs I. Ganesan,

Madras High CourtJUDGMENT: September 29, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Interest on delayed gratuity must follow Rule 45(A), not judicially enhanced rates.. The Government of Tamil Nadu, vs I. Ganesan,. Madras High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The first respondent sought interest at 18% per annum on delayed payment of DCRG, commuted pension, PF, GPF and other retirement benefits for the period from 1 September 2007 to 4 June 2012, relying on Rule 45-A(1-A)(i)(a) of the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

Source reference: p.2

The writ court granted interest at 12% per annum.

Source reference: p.2

The State appealed against that order.

Source reference: p.2
02

Issues

1. Whether the writ court could award interest at a rate different from that prescribed under Rule 45-A of the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978

Source reference: pp.4–5

2. Whether the first respondent was entitled to interest on delayed retirement benefits at the rate prescribed by Rule 45-A

Source reference: pp.2, 5
03

Law Applied

Rule 45-A of the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 governs interest on delayed payment of death-cum-retirement gratuity.

Source reference: pp.2–4

It prescribes the applicable rate and the period after which interest becomes payable; from 1 April 2004, the rate is linked to the interest payable on the General Provident Fund during the year of retirement, compounded annually.

Source reference: pp.2–4

The Court held that where the Rules prescribe the rate, courts should not award a higher or lower rate by exercising discretion, as the pension scheme must be applied uniformly and consistently.

Source reference: pp.2–4
04

Reasoning

The Court treated Rule 45-A as prescribing the governing rate and relevant delay period for the payment at issue.

Source reference: pp.4–5

It held that departing from the Rule by granting a discretionary rate would risk inconsistent treatment of pensioners and government employees.

Source reference: pp.4–5

Accordingly, the writ court’s 12% award could not stand independently of the rate prescribed by the Rule; the interest was instead to be calculated in accordance with Rule 45-A.

Source reference: pp.4–5
05

Holding

The appeal was partly allowed.

The order dated 20 June 2023 was modified, and the appellants were directed to pay the first respondent interest at the rate contemplated by Rule 45-A of the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978, within twelve weeks of receiving a copy of the judgment.

Source reference: p.5

No costs were awarded, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.

Source reference: p.5
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Linked provisions open on LawLens.

Letters Patent1

Section 15
Madras High Court

Original Court PDF

The Government of Tamil Nadu,vsI. Ganesan,

Madras High Court · September 29, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment