Gujarat High Court

Interest on GST Refund Accrues from Date of Initial Application if Subsequent Refiling Follows Court Intervention

KUEHNE NAGEL PVT. LTD. vs THE UNION OF INDIA

Gujarat High CourtJUDGMENT: July 02, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioners filed an original refund application on 14.10.2023

Source reference: para. 4

The respondent authorities initially refused to accept/process the application, leading the petitioners to file a writ petition (SCA No. 12151 of 2025). On 06.11.2025, the High Court set aside the respondents' refusal and directed them to process the refund claim

Source reference: para. 4, 5

Following this order, the petitioners submitted a fresh application on 11.11.2025

Source reference: para. 4.1

The respondents sanctioned the principal refund amount of Rs. 2,29,32,535/- but rejected the interest claim of Rs. 29,51,700/-, arguing that the conditions for interest under Section 56 of the CGST Act were not met, as they calculated the timeline from the subsequent application date rather than the original 2023 filing

Source reference: para. 3, 4.1
02

Issues

Whether the date for calculating interest on a delayed refund under Section 56 of the CGST Act should be the date of the initial application (14.10.2023) or the date of the subsequent application (11.11.2025) filed after judicial intervention.

Source reference: para. 4.1, 7
03

Law Applied

Section 56 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act), which provides for interest on delayed refunds if the amount is not refunded within sixty days from the date of receipt of the application

Source reference: para. 3

The principle of judicial restitution, emphasizing that when a prior administrative action—refusing to process a refund—is declared illegal by a court, the state cannot benefit from its own wrong by resetting the limitation period for interest

Source reference: para. 7
04

Reasoning

the initial action of the respondents in refusing to process the refund application dated 14.10.2023 was held to be illegal in the previous round of litigation (SCA No. 12151 of 2025), that original date must be preserved for statutory benefits

Source reference: para. 6, 7

The "Proper Officer" had erroneously construed the subsequent filing on 11.11.2025 as a fresh start-point for the accrual of interest

Source reference: para. 4.1

The court held that because the original denial was set aside, the subsequent application merely satisfied procedural requirements following the court's mandate, and thus, the claim for interest must relate back to the date of the earlier application to satisfy the intent of Section 56

Source reference: para. 7
05

Holding

The Court allowed the petitions and set aside the impugned orders to the extent that they denied the interest

The Court held that the interest under Section 56 of the CGST Act must be processed by considering the date of the initial application (14.10.2023)

Source reference: para. 7

The respondents were directed to pass necessary orders on the claim of interest within twelve weeks from the date of receipt of the order. Rule was made absolute with no order as to costs

Source reference: para. 7
Gujarat High Court

Original Court PDF

KUEHNE NAGEL PVT. LTD.vsTHE UNION OF INDIA

Gujarat High Court · July 02, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment