Manipur High CourtCriminal Procedure and EvidenceCriminal Law

Interim pre-arrest bail made absolute where accused cooperate with investigation and custodial interrogation is unnecessary.

SOIBAM JAMINIKANTA SINGH AND 4 OTHERSv.OFFICER IN CHARGE, THOUBAL POLICE STATION AND 4 OTHERS

Interim pre-arrest bail made absolute where accused cooperate with investigation and custodial interrogation is unnecessary.. SOIBAM JAMINIKANTA SINGH AND 4 OTHERS vs OFFICER IN CHARGE, THOUBAL POLICE STATION AND 4 OTHERS. Manipur High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the interim pre-arrest bail granted to the petitioners should be made absolute based on their cooperation with the investigation and the lack of necessity for custodial interrogation.

The court held

The Court answered the issue in the affirmative, holding that the petitioners were entitled to permanent pre-arrest bail.

It also directed

The High Court made absolute the interim orders dated 20-10-2023 and 25-10-2023, thereby disposing of AB No. 39 of 2023 and AB No. 40 of 2023, and closed the connected miscellaneous cases.

01Facts

Seven petitioners, all accused in FIR No. 161(8)2023 TBL PS, filed applications for anticipatory bail.

¶ 2-3

The FIR alleged offenses under Sections 448 (house-trespass), 427 (mischief), 380 (theft), 325 (grievous hurt), 384 (extortion), and 34 (common intention) of the IPC.

¶ 3

On 20-10-2023 and 25-10-2023, the High Court granted interim pre-arrest bail to the petitioners subject to conditions of cooperation and furnishing bail bonds.

¶ 4-5

The State subsequently submitted a report from the Thoubal Police Station dated 16-05-2026 confirming that the accused had joined the investigation and their statements were recorded.

¶ 6

02Issues

i.1. Whether the interim pre-arrest bail granted to the petitioners should be made absolute based on their cooperation with the investigation and the lack of necessity for custodial interrogation.

¶ 7-8

03Law Applied

The Court primarily applied the principles governing the grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), focusing on whether the accused are cooperating with the investigation and whether custodial interrogation is indispensable for the probe.

¶ 6, 8

The court relied on the Investigating Officer's (IO) report to determine if the petitioners fulfilled the conditions of the interim bail orders previously granted.

¶ 6

Provisions in the judgment · 8 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Indian Penal Code, 1860 Section 326Section 302Section 448Section 427Section 380Section 325Section 384Section 34

04Reasoning

The Court examined the updated status report submitted by the Officer In-charge of the Thoubal Police Station which explicitly stated that all seven petitioners appeared before the IO on 23-11-2023, participated in interrogations, and had their statements recorded.

¶ 6

The prosecution, represented by the Public Prosecutor, conceded that the petitioners were fully cooperating with the investigation and that the police did not require custodial interrogation to proceed with the case.

¶ 6, 8

Because the primary objectives of the investigation involving the accused were being met without the need for detention, the Court reasoned that the interim protection should be finalized.

¶ 9

05Holding

The Court answered the issue in the affirmative, holding that the petitioners were entitled to permanent pre-arrest bail.

¶ 9

The High Court made absolute the interim orders dated 20-10-2023 and 25-10-2023, thereby disposing of AB No. 39 of 2023 and AB No. 40 of 2023, and closed the connected miscellaneous cases.

¶ 9
Manipur High Court

Original Court PDF

SOIBAM JAMINIKANTA SINGH AND 4 OTHERSvsOFFICER IN CHARGE, THOUBAL POLICE STATION AND 4 OTHERS

Manipur High Court · May 07, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment