Jharkhand HC Quashes Trespass, Extortion FIR Against Three Men After Parties Settle Civil Dispute

In brief

The question

1. Whether the High Court should exercise its inherent jurisdiction under Section 528 of the BNSS to quash the FIR and criminal proceedings on the basis of the parties’ compromise.

The court held

The Court answered the issues in favour of the petitioners and held that the case was fit for exercise of its inherent jurisdiction.

It also directed

It quashed and set aside, qua the petitioners, the FIR and entire criminal proceedings in Basia P.S. Case No. 50 of 2024, registered under Sections 442, 447, 452, 383 and 34 IPC.

The criminal miscellaneous petition was allowed, and the interlocutory application was disposed of

01Facts

The petitioners invoked Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the FIR and criminal proceedings in Basia P.S. Case No. 50 of 2024, registered under Sections 442, 447, 452, 383 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶ 2

At the time of the petition, investigation was ongoing and no charge-sheet had been filed

¶ 3

The petitioners and the informant jointly stated that the case arose from a civil dispute, which they had settled amicably; the informant did not wish to proceed against the petitioners.

¶ 4

The State had no objection to the quashing petition

¶ 5

02Issues

i.1. Whether the High Court should exercise its inherent jurisdiction under Section 528 of the BNSS to quash the FIR and criminal proceedings on the basis of the parties’ compromise.

¶ 2, 4, 6

ii.2. Whether the nature of the alleged offences and the circumstances of the settlement made continuation of the proceedings an abuse of process or contrary to the ends of justice.

¶ 6–8

03Law Applied

Section 528 of the BNSS preserves the High Court’s inherent power to make orders necessary to prevent abuse of the process of a court or otherwise secure the ends of justice.

¶ 2

Applying the principles in Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur v. State of Gujarat, (2017) 9 SCC 641, including the principles drawn from Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, (2012) 10 SCC 303, the Court noted that the power to quash on settlement is distinct from statutory compounding.

¶ 6

A High Court may quash proceedings involving disputes with an overwhelmingly civil or private character where the parties have fully settled, the possibility of conviction is remote and bleak, and continuation would cause oppression or injustice; the nature and gravity of the offence must be considered, and heinous or serious offences generally cannot be quashed merely because of a compromise.

¶ 6

Provisions in the judgment · 8 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528

Indian Penal Code, 1860 Section 442 Section 447 Section 452 Section 383 Section 34

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 482 Section 320

04Reasoning

The Court found that the alleged offences were neither heinous nor offences involving serious mental depravity.

¶ 7–8

It accepted the parties’ joint position that the case arose from a misunderstanding connected with a civil dispute and had been amicably settled.

¶ 4–5

Given the informant’s decision not to proceed, the settlement, and the State’s lack of objection, the Court concluded that the prospect of conviction was remote and that continuing the prosecution would cause hardship to the petitioners.

¶ 4–5, 7–8

05Holding

The Court answered the issues in favour of the petitioners and held that the case was fit for exercise of its inherent jurisdiction.

¶ 8

It quashed and set aside, qua the petitioners, the FIR and entire criminal proceedings in Basia P.S. Case No. 50 of 2024, registered under Sections 442, 447, 452, 383 and 34 IPC.

¶ 8–11

The criminal miscellaneous petition was allowed, and the interlocutory application was disposed of

¶ 8–11

LawLens.Jharkhand High Court

Original Court PDF