Karnataka High CourtTransport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Law

Karnataka HC Adds ₹5,000 Each To Awards For Four Passengers Hurt In KSRTC-Lorry Crash

SUMITRA D/O. YANKOBAv.SRI. RAJA SAB S/O. KHASIM SAB

Karnataka HC Adds ₹5,000 Each To Awards For Four Passengers Hurt In KSRTC-Lorry Crash. SUMITRA D/O. YANKOBA vs SRI. RAJA SAB S/O. KHASIM SAB. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal was inadequate and required modification.

The court held

The Court partly allowed all four appeals and modified the awards.

It also directed

Compensation was increased from Rs.15,000 to Rs.20,000 in MFA Nos. 100837, 100627 and 100635 of 2021, and from Rs.10,000 to Rs.15,000 in MFA No.100626 of 2021.

The enhanced amounts carry interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petitions until payment, and KSRTC was directed to deposit them with accrued interest before the Tribunal within four weeks of receiving the certified judgment.

01Facts

On 14 April 2016, the appellants were travelling as passengers in a KSRTC bus when it collided with a lorry near Havambhavi check post, Ballari.

pp. 5–7, paras 3–8

They sustained injuries and sought compensation before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ballari.

pp. 5–7, paras 3–8

The Tribunal awarded Rs.15,000 in MVC Nos. 1107, 1108 and 1110 of 2018, and Rs.10,000 in MVC No.1109 of 2018.

pp. 5–7, paras 3–8

The claimants appealed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement.

pp. 5–7, paras 3–8

The judgment records a discrepancy in the Tribunal award date: the opening paragraph gives 06.01.2018, while the appeal descriptions state 06.01.2020.

pp. 2–4 · p. 5, para 1

02Issues

i.1. Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal was inadequate and required modification.

p. 8, para 11(i)

ii.2. What order should follow.

p. 8, para 11(ii)

03Law Applied

The appeals were brought under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which provides the appellate route invoked by the claimants.

pp. 2–4

The judgment identifies no other statutory provision or precedent as the basis for reassessing compensation; it considers the injury evidence and whether the Tribunal’s awards warranted enhancement.

pp. 8, paras 13–14

Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173

04Reasoning

The Court reviewed the wound certificates and found that they recorded only simple injuries.

p. 8, para 13

It also noted the absence of other material evidence establishing medical expenses.

p. 8, para 13

Although it considered that the Tribunal had rightly assessed compensation, it awarded an additional Rs.5,000 to each claimant in the interest of justice.

p. 8, para 14

05Holding

The Court partly allowed all four appeals and modified the awards.

pp. 9–10, order clauses (i)–(vi)

Compensation was increased from Rs.15,000 to Rs.20,000 in MFA Nos. 100837, 100627 and 100635 of 2021, and from Rs.10,000 to Rs.15,000 in MFA No.100626 of 2021.

pp. 9–10, order clauses (i)–(vi)

The enhanced amounts carry interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petitions until payment, and KSRTC was directed to deposit them with accrued interest before the Tribunal within four weeks of receiving the certified judgment.

pp. 10, order clauses (vii)–(viii)
Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

SUMITRA D/O. YANKOBAvsSRI. RAJA SAB S/O. KHASIM SAB

Karnataka High Court · November 02, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment