Karnataka High CourtTransport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Law

Karnataka HC Adds Travel Allowance, Bonus To Infosys Engineer’s Income, Raises Bus-Accident Compensation To ₹29.83 Lakh

SRI. MANJUNATH M ANGADIv.THE PARTNER

Karnataka HC Adds Travel Allowance, Bonus To Infosys Engineer’s Income, Raises Bus-Accident Compensation To ₹29.83 Lakh. SRI. MANJUNATH M ANGADI vs THE PARTNER. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

Whether the Tribunal’s assessment of compensation for pain and suffering, loss of amenities, and income loss during the treatment period required enhancement.

The court held

The Court partly allowed the appeal and increased total compensation to ₹29,83,444, awarding enhanced compensation of ₹3,31,112 with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition until realization.

It also directed

The insurer was directed to deposit the enhanced amount with interest before the Tribunal within six weeks, and the claimant was entitled to release of the entire enhanced compensation.

01Facts

The claimant sustained injuries in a road accident on 23 April 2018 while travelling as a passenger on a bus.

¶ 3–4

The Additional District Judge and Additional MACT, Udupi, awarded him total compensation of ₹26,52,332, including compensation for permanent disability, treatment-period income loss, medical expenses, pain and suffering, loss of amenities, and future medical expenses.

¶ 3–4

He appealed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement.

¶ 1

02Issues

i.Whether the Tribunal’s assessment of compensation for pain and suffering, loss of amenities, and income loss during the treatment period required enhancement.

¶ 8–9, 14

ii.Whether the claimant’s monthly income, future prospects, and permanent-disability compensation were correctly assessed.

¶ 10–13

03Law Applied

The appeal was brought under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

p. 2

In assessing compensation for accident-related injury, the Court considered the claimant’s age and applicable multiplier, disability, income, future prospects, treatment-related loss, and the distinct heads of pain and suffering, loss of amenities, medical expenses, and future medical expenses.

¶ 6–16

Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173

04Reasoning

The Court upheld the Tribunal’s multiplier of 17 and its assessment of whole-body disability at 22%, considering the claimant’s age and the facial fractures.

¶ 6, 10

It found that the claimant’s salary certificate supported including travelling allowance and bonus, increasing monthly income to ₹38,143; it applied future prospects of 40%, rather than the 50% used by the Tribunal, to reassess loss of future income due to disability.

¶ 11–13

It also enhanced pain-and-suffering and loss-of-amenities awards, and allowed one month’s income loss during the laid-up period, while leaving medical and future medical expenses unchanged.

¶ 8–9, 14–15

05Holding

The Court partly allowed the appeal and increased total compensation to ₹29,83,444, awarding enhanced compensation of ₹3,31,112 with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition until realization.

¶ 16–18

The insurer was directed to deposit the enhanced amount with interest before the Tribunal within six weeks, and the claimant was entitled to release of the entire enhanced compensation.

¶ 18
Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

SRI. MANJUNATH M ANGADIvsTHE PARTNER

Karnataka High Court · October 16, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment