01Facts
The petitioners, teaching and non-teaching employees of aided educational institutions, sought recognition of service rendered from their respective appointment dates, including the period before their posts were admitted to grant-in-aid.
pp. 12–13, paras 2–3They asked that this service be considered for pay fixation, increments, seniority, pensionary benefits and other consequential service benefits, relying on the judgment in W.A. No. 2476/2015 and connected matters dated 24 July 2026.
pp. 12–13, paras 2–3The State submitted that the relief was limited by the clarification in paragraph 61 of that appellate judgment.
pp. 13–14, paras 5–602Issues
i.Whether service rendered before a post’s admission to grant-in-aid must be reckoned for notional pay fixation and consequential service benefits, including pension.
pp. 12–15, paras 2, 6–7ii.Whether employees may claim salary arrears or other monetary benefits from the State for the pre-grant period.
p. 14, para 603Law Applied
The Court applied the principle stated in paragraph 61 of the judgment in W.A. No. 2476/2015 and connected matters, read with Annexure I to the Rules, 1999.
p. 14, para 6The management of the institution remains liable for salary and other benefits until the post is admitted to grant-in-aid; the State is not liable for that pre-grant period.
p. 14, para 6However, the service rendered during that period must be counted for notional fixation of pay as at the date the post is admitted to grant-in-aid and for consequential benefits, including pension and other service benefits.
p. 14, para 6Employees are not entitled to claim pre-grant salary arrears or other monetary benefits from the State.
p. 14, para 604Reasoning
The Court treated paragraph 61 of the appellate judgment as controlling the extent of the petitioners’ entitlement.
pp. 14–15, paras 6–7It therefore distinguished recognition of pre-grant service for notional and consequential benefits from liability to pay salary for that period.
pp. 14–15, paras 6–7Since the former was permitted but the latter remained the management’s responsibility, the Court directed the authorities to reckon the petitioners’ service from their appointment dates for notional pay fixation and the calculation of pension and other service benefits, without granting State-funded pre-grant arrears.
pp. 14–15, paras 6–705Holding
The petition was allowed and disposed of.
p. 15, para 7Respondents 1 and 2 were directed to reckon each petitioner’s service from the date of appointment, including pre-grant service, for notional pay fixation and the calculation of pension and other service benefits.
p. 15, para 7The authorities were directed to complete this consideration within six months; no pre-grant salary arrears or other monetary benefits from the State were granted.
p. 15, para 7Original Court PDF
SRI SEETARAM NAIKvsTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
