Karnataka High CourtTransport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Law

Karnataka HC Raises Compensation For Software Engineer Injured In BMTC Bus Accident To ₹10 Lakh, Including ₹2.25 Lakh For Lost Income

SMT. SOWKYA K.Rv.THE MANAGING DIRECTOR

Karnataka HC Raises Compensation For Software Engineer Injured In BMTC Bus Accident To ₹10 Lakh, Including ₹2.25 Lakh For Lost Income. SMT. SOWKYA K.R vs THE MANAGING DIRECTOR. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the Tribunal’s award of ₹7,00,000 should be enhanced by awarding compensation under the heads of pain and suffering, loss of amenities, loss of income during the laid-up period, and incidental expenses.

The court held

The appeal was allowed in part, and the Tribunal’s award was modified to increase the claimant’s total compensation from ₹7,00,000 to ₹10,00,000.

It also directed

The respondent Corporation was directed to pay the enhanced amount of ₹3,00,000 with interest at 6% per annum within three months of receiving a copy of the order; the enhanced amount was to be released to the claimant.

01Facts

The claimant sustained injuries in a road traffic accident on 27 March 2017 involving a BMTC bus. The Tribunal awarded her global compensation of ₹7,00,000. She appealed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement, including compensation for pain and suffering, loss of amenities, loss of income during the laid-up period, and incidental expenses.

pp. 2–3

The High Court noted her head and facial injuries, 50 days of hospitalisation, and salary of ₹75,000 per month as shown in her salary certificate.

pp. 3–5

02Issues

i.1. Whether the Tribunal’s award of ₹7,00,000 should be enhanced by awarding compensation under the heads of pain and suffering, loss of amenities, loss of income during the laid-up period, and incidental expenses.

pp. 3–5

ii.2. Whether the Tribunal’s award of ₹6,00,000 for medical expenses should be disturbed.

p. 5

03Law Applied

The appeal was brought under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which provides for an appeal against an award of the Claims Tribunal.

p. 2

The judgment cites no further statutory provision or precedent. It assessed compensation by reference to the injuries and hospitalisation established in the record, the claimant’s documented monthly salary, and the medical bills, and considered whether separate amounts were warranted for the claimed heads.

pp. 3–5

Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173

04Reasoning

The Court held that the claimant’s traumatic brain injury and multiple facial fractures warranted ₹1,00,000 for pain and suffering; it awarded ₹50,000 for loss of amenities.

pp. 3–4

Given the 50 days of hospitalisation and documented salary of ₹75,000 per month, it assessed loss of income for three months at ₹2,25,000.

p. 5

It also awarded ₹25,000 for incidental expenses, while leaving undisturbed the Tribunal’s ₹6,00,000 award for medical expenses as just and proper.

pp. 5–6

These amounts produced total compensation of ₹10,00,000, an increase of ₹3,00,000.

p. 6

05Holding

The appeal was allowed in part, and the Tribunal’s award was modified to increase the claimant’s total compensation from ₹7,00,000 to ₹10,00,000.

pp. 6–7

The respondent Corporation was directed to pay the enhanced amount of ₹3,00,000 with interest at 6% per annum within three months of receiving a copy of the order; the enhanced amount was to be released to the claimant.

p. 7
Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

SMT. SOWKYA K.RvsTHE MANAGING DIRECTOR

Karnataka High Court · October 15, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment