Karnataka High CourtTransport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Law

Karnataka HC Raises Motorcycle-Hit Pedestrian’s Compensation To Rs 3.95 Lakh, Including 3 Months’ Lost Earnings

SRI SANJEEVA MARAKALAv.SRI K S DAKSHITH KUMAR

Karnataka HC Raises Motorcycle-Hit Pedestrian’s Compensation To Rs 3.95 Lakh, Including 3 Months’ Lost Earnings. SRI SANJEEVA MARAKALA vs SRI K S DAKSHITH KUMAR. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the Tribunal’s assessment of the claimant’s income for calculating loss of future income due to disability required enhancement

The court held

The appeal was allowed in part.

It also directed

The Court modified the award and increased the total compensation from ₹3,07,000 to ₹3,95,650, including an enhancement of ₹88,650, rounded to ₹89,000, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition until realization.

The insurer was directed to deposit the enhanced compensation within six weeks of receiving the certified copy; upon deposit, the amount was to be released to the claimant.

01Facts

The appellant-claimant was injured when a motorcycle struck him while he was walking beside National Highway No. 66 on 21 February 2023.

pp. 2–5 · ¶ 1, 3–5, 7

The Senior Civil Judge and Additional MACT, Kundapura, assessed his monthly income at ₹14,000, disability at 6% to the whole body, and awarded ₹3,07,000 with interest at 6% per annum.

pp. 2–5 · ¶ 1, 3–5, 7

He appealed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement, principally on the grounds that the income assessment and conventional heads of compensation were inadequate

pp. 2–5 · ¶ 1, 3–5, 7

02Issues

i.1. Whether the Tribunal’s assessment of the claimant’s income for calculating loss of future income due to disability required enhancement

pp. 5–6 · ¶ 7–10

ii.2. Whether the compensation awarded under the other relevant heads required reassessment

pp. 6–7 · ¶ 11–12

03Law Applied

The appeal was brought under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which provides for an appeal against an award of a Claims Tribunal.

p. 2 · ¶ 1

In assessing compensation, the Court applied the Karnataka State Legal Services Authority’s notional-income figure for 2023, identified as ₹16,250 per month, and calculated loss of future income using the claimant’s 6% whole-body disability and multiplier of 7.

p. 6 · ¶ 10 · p. 7 · ¶ 11

The Court also reassessed compensation for pain and suffering, loss of amenities, laid-off-period earnings, and nourishment by reference to the claimant’s injuries, six-day hospitalisation, and need for at least three months’ bed rest.

pp. 6–7 · ¶ 11

No precedent is cited in the judgment.

Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173

04Reasoning

The Court found that the Tribunal’s monthly-income assessment of ₹14,000 was below the KSLSA figure applicable to the year of the accident, and substituted ₹16,250 when recalculating loss of future income: ₹16,250 × 12 × 6% × 7 = ₹81,900.

p. 6 · ¶ 10 · p. 7 · ¶ 11

It further considered that the claimant’s locomotor injuries caused pain and restricted movement and required a period of bed rest. On that basis, it increased compensation for pain and suffering, loss of amenities, loss of earnings during the laid-off period, and extra nourishment, while leaving medical expenses, food/conveyance/attendant charges during treatment, and future medical expenses unchanged.

pp. 6–7 · ¶ 11

05Holding

The appeal was allowed in part.

pp. 7–8 · ¶ 12–13

The Court modified the award and increased the total compensation from ₹3,07,000 to ₹3,95,650, including an enhancement of ₹88,650, rounded to ₹89,000, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition until realization.

pp. 7–8 · ¶ 12–13

The insurer was directed to deposit the enhanced compensation within six weeks of receiving the certified copy; upon deposit, the amount was to be released to the claimant.

p. 8 · ¶ 13
Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

SRI SANJEEVA MARAKALAvsSRI K S DAKSHITH KUMAR

Karnataka High Court · November 06, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment