Karnataka High Court
Transport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Law

Karnataka High Court adds ₹30,000 monthly for a working mother’s domestic care when calculating fatal-accident compensation

SMT. PRAKASH D M vs THE MANAGING DIRECTOR (KSRTC)

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: October 16, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Karnataka High Court adds ₹30,000 monthly for a working mother’s domestic care when calculating fatal-accident compensation. SMT. PRAKASH D M vs THE MANAGING DIRECTOR (KSRTC). Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The claimants— the deceased’s husband and two minor children—sought compensation for her death in a road accident involving a KSRTC bus.

Source reference: pp. 2–5

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal partly allowed the claim, assessed compensation at Rs. 15,38,012, attributed 20% contributory negligence to the deceased, deducted Rs. 15,000 interim compensation, and awarded Rs. 12,15,409 with interest at 6% per annum.

Source reference: pp. 2–5

The claimants appealed, challenging the contributory-negligence finding and seeking enhanced compensation, including compensation for the deceased’s domestic care in addition to her earnings.

Source reference: pp. 2–5
02

Issues

Whether the Tribunal was justified in attributing 20% contributory negligence to the deceased

Source reference: p. 6

Whether the claimants were entitled to enhancement of the compensation awarded by the Tribunal

Source reference: p. 6
03

Law Applied

Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act provides for an appeal to the High Court against an award of the Claims Tribunal.

Source reference: p. 2

In Shishu Pal @ Shish Ram & Ors. v. Surjeet & Ors., 2026 INSC 634, the Supreme Court held that, where a deceased homemaker was also part of the workforce, a composite sum of Rs. 30,000 per month for loss of domestic care is to be awarded in addition to the deceased’s proved monthly income, where the relevant forms of domestic support are established.

Source reference: pp. 5, 9–10

The judgment also applied the principles of dependency calculation, including deduction for personal expenses, the applicable multiplier, and future prospects.

Source reference: p. 10
04

Reasoning

The Court upheld the 20% contributory-negligence finding because the deceased was crossing near the road median, which it considered an inappropriate place for pedestrians to cross.

Source reference: p. 7

It concluded that the Tribunal had properly apportioned negligence, notwithstanding the absence of brake or tyre marks.

Source reference: p. 7

On quantum, the Court recalculated the deceased’s net monthly salary as Rs. 14,671 and found that she had also provided domestic, maternal, and spousal support.

Source reference: pp. 8–12

Applying Shishu Pal, it added Rs. 30,000 per month for domestic care to her earnings, then applied a one-third deduction for personal expenses, a multiplier of 17, and 40% future prospects.

Source reference: pp. 8–12

It also awarded consortium to each claimant, funeral expenses, and loss of estate.

Source reference: pp. 8–12

After deducting 20% for contributory negligence and the interim payment, the Court calculated total compensation payable at Rs. 69,09,286.

Source reference: p. 12
05

Holding

The appeal was allowed in part.

The Court affirmed the deceased’s 20% contributory negligence and enhanced the compensation, directing payment with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition until realization.

Source reference: pp. 12–13

It apportioned the claimants’ shares in the ratio of 50:25:25 and directed that the minors’ shares be kept in fixed deposits until majority; 50% of the first claimant’s share was to be released, with the remainder placed in a five-year fixed deposit.

Source reference: pp. 12–13

The operative order specifies enhanced compensation of Rs. 56,93,877; paragraph 14 states Rs. 56,93,886, an apparent discrepancy in the judgment.

Source reference: pp. 12–13
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Motor Vehicles Act, 19881

Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

SMT. PRAKASH D MvsTHE MANAGING DIRECTOR (KSRTC)

Karnataka High Court · October 16, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment