Facts
The petitioner alleged that respondent No. 7 had purchased Kotwari service land, which she contended was non-transferable, and complained that the authorities had not acted on the alleged transfer and ongoing construction
Source reference: para. 1–2The State submitted that the Collector was conducting an inquiry into whether the land had been sold to respondent No. 7 and stated that appropriate action would follow if the sale were established
Source reference: para. 3The petitioner accepted that submission but sought a direction to complete the inquiry within a fixed period
Source reference: para. 4Issues
Whether the authorities should inquire into the alleged sale of Kotwari land to respondent No. 7 and take appropriate action if the transfer is established
Source reference: para. 2–3, 6Whether the inquiry should be completed within a stipulated period
Source reference: para. 4, 7Law Applied
The Court relied on the Full Bench decision in Gajendra Das v. State of Chhattisgarh, W.P.(C) No. 1571 of 2020, decided on 23 July 2026, as stating that Kotwari land cannot be alienated and no title can be acquired on the basis of such land; if such land has been sold, it is to be retained by the State in accordance with law
Source reference: para. 6Although the petitioner sought action under Section 183 of the M.P./C.G. Land Revenue Code, 1959, the Court did not independently interpret or apply that provision
Source reference: para. 1Reasoning
The Court did not determine whether respondent No. 7 had in fact purchased Kotwari land.
Source reference: para. 3–7In light of the State’s submission that the Collector’s inquiry was ongoing and the Full Bench ruling on non-transferability, it left the factual determination and consequential action to the authorities.
Source reference: para. 3–7It directed that the inquiry and appropriate orders be completed within three months, including ensuring that the land remains with the State if the alleged sale is established
Source reference: para. 3–7Holding
The petition was disposed of with a direction to the concerned authorities to complete the inquiry and pass appropriate orders within three months of receiving a copy of the order.
If the land is found to be Kotwari land sold to respondent No. 7, the authorities must ensure its retention by the State in accordance with law
Source reference: para. 6–8The Court did not itself declare the transaction void or grant the other substantive reliefs sought.
Source reference: para. 6–8Acts & Sections Cited
1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
MP Land Revenue Code 19591
Original Court PDF
ROSHAN ARAvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
