Chhattisgarh High Court
Property and Real Estate LawAdministrative and Public Law

Kotwari service land is non-transferable, and no title can be acquired through its sale.

ROSHAN ARA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: September 30, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Kotwari service land is non-transferable, and no title can be acquired through its sale.. ROSHAN ARA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioner alleged that respondent No. 7 had purchased Kotwari service land, which she contended was non-transferable, and complained that the authorities had not acted on the alleged transfer and ongoing construction

Source reference: para. 1–2

The State submitted that the Collector was conducting an inquiry into whether the land had been sold to respondent No. 7 and stated that appropriate action would follow if the sale were established

Source reference: para. 3

The petitioner accepted that submission but sought a direction to complete the inquiry within a fixed period

Source reference: para. 4
02

Issues

Whether the authorities should inquire into the alleged sale of Kotwari land to respondent No. 7 and take appropriate action if the transfer is established

Source reference: para. 2–3, 6

Whether the inquiry should be completed within a stipulated period

Source reference: para. 4, 7
03

Law Applied

The Court relied on the Full Bench decision in Gajendra Das v. State of Chhattisgarh, W.P.(C) No. 1571 of 2020, decided on 23 July 2026, as stating that Kotwari land cannot be alienated and no title can be acquired on the basis of such land; if such land has been sold, it is to be retained by the State in accordance with law

Source reference: para. 6

Although the petitioner sought action under Section 183 of the M.P./C.G. Land Revenue Code, 1959, the Court did not independently interpret or apply that provision

Source reference: para. 1
04

Reasoning

The Court did not determine whether respondent No. 7 had in fact purchased Kotwari land.

Source reference: para. 3–7

In light of the State’s submission that the Collector’s inquiry was ongoing and the Full Bench ruling on non-transferability, it left the factual determination and consequential action to the authorities.

Source reference: para. 3–7

It directed that the inquiry and appropriate orders be completed within three months, including ensuring that the land remains with the State if the alleged sale is established

Source reference: para. 3–7
05

Holding

The petition was disposed of with a direction to the concerned authorities to complete the inquiry and pass appropriate orders within three months of receiving a copy of the order.

If the land is found to be Kotwari land sold to respondent No. 7, the authorities must ensure its retention by the State in accordance with law

Source reference: para. 6–8

The Court did not itself declare the transaction void or grant the other substantive reliefs sought.

Source reference: para. 6–8
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

MP Land Revenue Code 19591

Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

ROSHAN ARAvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · September 30, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment