Facts
The fourteen petitioners were appointed as Laboratory Assistants on various dates between 1992 and 2019 across different colleges in the Gondia, Chandrapur, Wardha, and Nagpur districts of Maharashtra.
Source reference: p. 3-5While some petitioners are currently working, others have retired.
Source reference: para. 5The petitioners approached the High Court seeking the implementation of a revised pay scale of Rs. 4,000–6,000, asserting that they were entitled to the benefits of the Government Resolution (GR) dated 27.02.2006, which had been previously affirmed by judicial precedents.
Source reference: para. 4, 6Issues
1. Whether the petitioners, serving or retired as Laboratory Assistants, are entitled to the revised pay scale of Rs. 4,000–6,000 as per the Government Resolution dated 27.02.2006.
Source reference: para. 42. Whether the state is mandated to extend the relevant monetary benefits and arrears under the 7th Pay Scale based on that revised base pay.
Source reference: para. 8Law Applied
Government Resolution (GR) dated 27.02.2006, which stipulates the revised pay scale for the post of Laboratory Assistant.
Source reference: para. 4, 6The principle of stare decisis, specifically citing the precedent set by the Co-ordinate Bench at Aurangabad in Writ Petition No. 7537/2025 (dated 30.06.2025), which held that the benefits of the 2006 GR are applicable to similarly situated Laboratory Assistants.
Source reference: para. 6Reasoning
The court noted that the legal entitlement to the pay scale of Rs. 4,000–6,000 is no longer res integra (an unsettled point of law).
Source reference: para. 6This determination was based on the fact that the respondents did not deny the applicability of the Government Resolution dated 27.02.2006 to the petitioners.
Source reference: para. 6By comparing the facts of the present case with the earlier ruling in Writ Petition No. 7537/2025, the court found that the petitioners’ roles and the nature of the dispute were identical to the matter already decided by the Aurangabad Bench.
Source reference: para. 6Consequently, because the GR remained in force and the precedent was binding, the court found no legal impediment to granting the relief.
Source reference: para. 6-7Holding
The High Court allowed the Writ Petition, declaring that the petitioners are entitled to the pay scale of Rs. 4,000–6,000 as prescribed in the GR dated 27.02.2006.
The court directed the respondents to grant the revised pay scale and calculate relevant monetary benefits and arrears in accordance with the 7th Pay Scale; respondents are ordered to release all such monetary benefits within three months from the receipt of the order.
Source reference: para. 8-9Original Court PDF
Nitin Anandrao Pathode And OthersvsChief Secretary, Higher And Technical Education Dept., Mumbai And Ors.
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in