Bombay High Court

Laboratory Assistants in educational institutions are entitled to the revised pay-scale of Rs. 4000-6000.

Nitin Anandrao Pathode And Others vs Chief Secretary, Higher And Technical Education Dept., Mumbai And Ors.

Bombay High CourtJUDGMENT: June 16, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The fourteen petitioners were appointed as Laboratory Assistants on various dates between 1992 and 2019 across different colleges in the Gondia, Chandrapur, Wardha, and Nagpur districts of Maharashtra.

Source reference: p. 3-5

While some petitioners are currently working, others have retired.

Source reference: para. 5

The petitioners approached the High Court seeking the implementation of a revised pay scale of Rs. 4,000–6,000, asserting that they were entitled to the benefits of the Government Resolution (GR) dated 27.02.2006, which had been previously affirmed by judicial precedents.

Source reference: para. 4, 6
02

Issues

1. Whether the petitioners, serving or retired as Laboratory Assistants, are entitled to the revised pay scale of Rs. 4,000–6,000 as per the Government Resolution dated 27.02.2006.

Source reference: para. 4

2. Whether the state is mandated to extend the relevant monetary benefits and arrears under the 7th Pay Scale based on that revised base pay.

Source reference: para. 8
03

Law Applied

Government Resolution (GR) dated 27.02.2006, which stipulates the revised pay scale for the post of Laboratory Assistant.

Source reference: para. 4, 6

The principle of stare decisis, specifically citing the precedent set by the Co-ordinate Bench at Aurangabad in Writ Petition No. 7537/2025 (dated 30.06.2025), which held that the benefits of the 2006 GR are applicable to similarly situated Laboratory Assistants.

Source reference: para. 6
04

Reasoning

The court noted that the legal entitlement to the pay scale of Rs. 4,000–6,000 is no longer res integra (an unsettled point of law).

Source reference: para. 6

This determination was based on the fact that the respondents did not deny the applicability of the Government Resolution dated 27.02.2006 to the petitioners.

Source reference: para. 6

By comparing the facts of the present case with the earlier ruling in Writ Petition No. 7537/2025, the court found that the petitioners’ roles and the nature of the dispute were identical to the matter already decided by the Aurangabad Bench.

Source reference: para. 6

Consequently, because the GR remained in force and the precedent was binding, the court found no legal impediment to granting the relief.

Source reference: para. 6-7
05

Holding

The High Court allowed the Writ Petition, declaring that the petitioners are entitled to the pay scale of Rs. 4,000–6,000 as prescribed in the GR dated 27.02.2006.

The court directed the respondents to grant the revised pay scale and calculate relevant monetary benefits and arrears in accordance with the 7th Pay Scale; respondents are ordered to release all such monetary benefits within three months from the receipt of the order.

Source reference: para. 8-9
Bombay High Court

Original Court PDF

Nitin Anandrao Pathode And OthersvsChief Secretary, Higher And Technical Education Dept., Mumbai And Ors.

Bombay High Court · June 16, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment