01Facts
The petitioner sought a declaration that the reservation of his lands in Thirumalai Naicken Pudukudi Village, Puliangudi Municipality, for a proposed EIE1 D.D. Road under Detailed Development Plan No. 4, notified by G.O.Ms.No.1730 RD and LA dated 24 July 1974, had lapsed under Section 38 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971. He stated that he had purchased the lands, that revenue records had been transferred to his name, and that the authorities had not acted on his representation seeking release of the lands.
pp. 2–3During the proceedings, the Assistant Director of Town and Country Planning stated that no action had been taken to acquire the lands under Section 38.
p. 502Issues
i.Whether the reservation of the petitioner’s lands for the proposed road under Detailed Development Plan No. 4 had lapsed under Section 38 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971.
pp. 2–3, 5–6ii.Whether the respondents should be directed to release the lands and update the Puliangudi Municipality Master Plan accordingly.
p. 603Law Applied
Sections 37 and 38 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 governed the acquisition and release of lands reserved or designated in a development plan. Section 37 provides for acquisition by agreement or through the statutory acquisition process. Under Section 38, where the statutory conditions are met—including the absence, within three years from publication of the relevant notice under Section 26 or 27, of a declaration under Section 37(2) or acquisition by agreement—the land is deemed released from the reservation, allotment or designation.
pp. 3–5The Court also relied on its earlier decision in W.P.(MD) No. 20277 of 2024, dated 23 September 2024, which applied Sections 37 and 38 to a reservation for which no acquisition action had been taken.
pp. 3–5Provisions in the judgment · 6
Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 Section 26Section 27Section 36Section 37Section 38
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 6
04Reasoning
The Assistant Director’s written instructions confirmed that no action had been taken under Section 38 to acquire the lands notified for the public road, and the authority accepted that the reservation had lapsed and the property stood released.
p. 5In light of that concession and the statutory position set out in Sections 37 and 38, the Court held that the reservation could not continue and that the land should be released from the plan.
pp. 5–605Holding
The Court allowed the writ petition and declared that the reservation over the petitioner’s specified lands for the proposed EIE1 D.D. Road under Detailed Development Plan No. 4 had lapsed under Section 38 of the Act.
p. 6It directed the respondents to release the lands and update the Puliangudi Municipality Master Plan within 12 weeks of receiving a copy of the order. No costs were awarded.
p. 6Original Court PDF
S.RajendranvsThe State of Tamilnadu
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
