Karnataka High Court

Man Accused Of Holding Two Passports Gets Case Quashed By Karnataka HC For Missing Passport Act Sanction, But Prosecution May Resume Once It Is Obtained

SYED ASHFAQ AHMED vs STATE OF KARNATAKA

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: October 05, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Man Accused Of Holding Two Passports Gets Case Quashed By Karnataka HC For Missing Passport Act Sanction, But Prosecution May Resume Once It Is Obtained. SYED ASHFAQ AHMED vs STATE OF KARNATAKA. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

Respondent No. 2 complained that the petitioner had obtained two Indian passports: one issued on 9 July 2013, valid until 8 July 2023, and another issued on 8 January 2015, valid until 7 January 2025.

Source reference: pp. 3–5

Police registered a case, later transferred it to Bharathi Nagar Police Station, and filed a charge-sheet alleging offences under Sections 419 and 420 of the IPC and Section 12(1)(b) of the Passports Act, 1967.

Source reference: pp. 3–5

The petitioner sought to quash the proceedings, principally arguing that prosecution under the Passports Act required prior sanction under Section 15, which had not been obtained.

Source reference: pp. 3–5

He also disputed that the IPC offences were made out

Source reference: pp. 3–5
02

Issues

Whether proceedings for an offence under Section 12(1)(b) of the Passports Act could continue without the prior sanction required by Section 15

Source reference: pp. 4–6

Whether the charge-sheet materials established the ingredients of Sections 419 and 420 of the IPC

Source reference: p. 4

The Court did not decide this issue on the merits

Source reference: p. 6
03

Law Applied

Section 15 of the Passports Act, 1967 bars institution of a prosecution for an offence under that Act without prior sanction of the Central Government or an officer or authority authorised by it in writing.

Source reference: pp. 5–6

The Court noted that the Central Government had delegated the relevant power to the State Government by notification dated 1 December 1979

Source reference: pp. 5–6

The alleged offences were under Sections 419 and 420 of the IPC and Section 12(1)(b) of the Passports Act

Source reference: pp. 3–4

No precedent was cited.

Source reference: no citation
04

Reasoning

The complaint’s central allegation—that the petitioner possessed two Indian passports at the same time—led police to invoke Section 12(1)(b) of the Passports Act.

Source reference: pp. 5–6

The Court held that the required sanction had not been obtained from the competent authority before the charge-sheet was filed.

Source reference: pp. 5–6

In the absence of that sanction, the order taking cognizance could not be sustained.

Source reference: pp. 5–6

The Court therefore quashed the proceedings on that ground alone, without deciding whether the IPC offences were made out

Source reference: pp. 5–6
05

Holding

The Court allowed the petition and quashed the proceedings in C.C. No. 57509/2022, arising from Crime No. 139/2021, for the alleged offences under Sections 419 and 420 of the IPC and Section 12(1)(b) of the Passports Act.

It left the prosecution at liberty to proceed after obtaining the necessary sanction in accordance with law and permitted the petitioner to apply to the Trial Court for release of his passport

Source reference: pp. 6–7
06

Acts & Sections Cited

5 provisions across 3 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Code of Criminal Procedure, 19731

Indian Penal Code, 18602

Passports Act, 19672

Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

SYED ASHFAQ AHMEDvsSTATE OF KARNATAKA

Karnataka High Court · October 05, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment