Delhi High Court

Mobile vendors with provisional COVs must strictly adhere to non-stationary vending conditions pending Town Vending Committee finalization.

Ramprakash And Ors. vs Govt Of Nct Delhi And Ors.

Delhi High CourtJUDGMENT: July 23, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

Four street vendors (Petitioners) operating in Kamla Nagar, Jawahar Nagar, Maurice Nagar, and Bunglow Road filed a writ petition seeking protection for their trade and to prevent obstruction by authorities

Source reference: p. 1-2, para. 4

All petitioners hold Certificates of Vending (COVs) under the "Others" category

Source reference: para. 6

Previously, in W.P.(C) 9813/2025, the court directed the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) to decide on the petitioners' representations to be treated as "stationary vendors" rather than mobile vendors

Source reference: para. 11

The current proceedings examined the nature of their vending based on photographs and COV terms

Source reference: para. 8-10
02

Issues

1. Whether the petitioners are entitled to carry on their trade without obstruction based on their existing COVs

Source reference: para. 4

2. Whether the petitioners’ status can be converted from mobile vendors to stationary vendors

Source reference: para. 11, 15
03

Law Applied

The court applied the terms and conditions prescribed under the COVs issued by the Town Vending Committee (TVC), which prohibit permanent construction, obstruction of pedestrians, and require adherence to hygiene standards

Source reference: para. 6

It further relied on the Delhi Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Scheme, 2019 and the statutory role of the TVC in determining vending plans and categories under the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014

Source reference: para. 6, condition 16, para. 15-16
04

Reasoning

The Court observed that based on the COV terms and photographic evidence, the petitioners are currently classified as mobile vendors, not stationary vendors

Source reference: para. 10

Therefore, they are bound by specific restrictions, such as not staying in one spot for more than 30 minutes (unless otherwise prescribed) and not creating permanent structures

Source reference: para. 6

The Court reasoned that while the petitioners have a right to vend under their provisional COVs, this right is subject to strict compliance with public health, safety, and non-obstruction of public pathways

Source reference: para. 13

Regarding the request for "stationary" status, the Court noted that the TVC is the appropriate statutory body to make such determinations as part of the overall vending plan for Delhi

Source reference: para. 12, 16
05

Holding

The Court disposed of the petition by permitting the petitioners to vend peacefully provided they: (i) follow COV terms; (ii) avoid permanent/temporary constructions; (iii) maintain cleanliness; (iv) refrain from using gas cylinders or selling food; and (v) stay within permissible limits

The Court held that the newly constituted TVC must decide on the petitioners' representations for stationary status within three months

Source reference: para. 15

No vested rights were created, and the order remains subject to the final vending plan to be determined by TVC-2

Source reference: para. 16-17
Delhi High Court

Original Court PDF

Ramprakash And Ors.vsGovt Of Nct Delhi And Ors.

Delhi High Court · July 23, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment