Chhattisgarh High Court
Transport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Procedure and Evidence

Motor accident compensation may reflect notified minimum wages and reasonable unreceipted hospitalisation expenses.

AAKASH SINGH RAJPUT vs SURESH VERMA

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: October 14, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Motor accident compensation may reflect notified minimum wages and reasonable unreceipted hospitalisation expenses.. AAKASH SINGH RAJPUT vs SURESH VERMA. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The appellants, sons of the deceased, appealed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement of compensation awarded for their mother’s death following a road accident on 3 March 2018.

Source reference: para. 13

The Claims Tribunal awarded Rs. 16,45,043, assessing her monthly income at Rs. 5,000 and making awards for medical expenses and related treatment costs.

Source reference: paras. 17–18

The High Court condoned the 287-day delay in filing the appeal and dispensed with respondent No. 4, the previous owner of the vehicle.

Source reference: paras. 4, 9–11
02

Issues

Whether the Claims Tribunal erred in assessing the deceased’s monthly income at Rs. 5,000 rather than the applicable minimum-wage rate of Rs. 7,930.

Source reference: paras. 14, 17

Whether the amounts awarded for medical expenses, attendant charges, special diet, and transportation required enhancement in light of the deceased’s 41-day hospitalisation.

Source reference: paras. 14, 18
03

Law Applied

Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, provides for an appeal against an award of a Claims Tribunal.

Source reference: para. 13

In assessing dependency compensation, the Court relied on National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi, Sarla Verma v. Delhi Transport Corporation, and Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Nanu Ram, applying the relevant principles concerning future prospects, deductions for personal expenses, multiplier, and conventional heads.

Source reference: paras. 17, 19

The Court also applied the Chhattisgarh minimum-wage notification to determine the deceased’s monthly income.

Source reference: para. 17

It recognised that hospitalisation and treatment may entail reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for which formal receipts may not be available.

Source reference: para. 18
04

Reasoning

The Court found that the applicable minimum-wage notification supported assessing the deceased’s monthly income at Rs. 7,930, rather than Rs. 5,000.

Source reference: para. 17

It otherwise upheld the Tribunal’s assessment of 25% future prospects, a one-third deduction for personal expenses, multiplier of 13, and Rs. 1,21,000 under conventional heads.

Source reference: para. 17

Given the 41-day hospitalisation and the likelihood of miscellaneous treatment-related expenditure, the Court increased the awards for medical expenses to Rs. 9,00,000, attendant charges to Rs. 40,000, special diet to Rs. 40,000, and transportation to Rs. 40,000.

Source reference: paras. 14, 18–19
05

Holding

The appeal was partly allowed.

Total compensation was enhanced from Rs. 16,45,043 to Rs. 21,71,900, leaving an additional Rs. 5,26,857 payable with interest at 6% per annum from the date the claim application was filed until realisation.

Source reference: paras. 20–21

The remaining conditions of the Tribunal’s award were left intact.

Source reference: paras. 20–21

The Registry was directed to communicate the enhanced amount to the claimants in Hindi.

Source reference: para. 22
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Motor Vehicles Act, 19881

Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

AAKASH SINGH RAJPUTvsSURESH VERMA

Chhattisgarh High Court · October 14, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment