Karnataka High Court
Transport, Maritime, and Aviation LawInsurance Law

Motor accident compensation must reflect 11% whole-body disability and three months’ lost income.

SRI PAVAN K vs SRI KARTHIK

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: October 15, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Motor accident compensation must reflect 11% whole-body disability and three months’ lost income.. SRI PAVAN K vs SRI KARTHIK. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The claimant, aged 43 at the time of the accident, sustained injuries in a road traffic accident on 16 May 2023 involving a motorcycle owned by respondent No. 1.

Source reference: p. 3–4

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal partly allowed his claim and awarded compensation of ₹2,85,870, including ₹2,15,040 for loss of future income based on 8% whole-body disability, with interest at 6% per annum.

Source reference: p. 3–4

The claimant appealed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement.

Source reference: p. 2

The High Court considered the appeal with the consent of the claimant and insurer’s counsel.

Source reference: p. 3
02

Issues

1. Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal required enhancement, including reassessment of income, disability, and compensation under relevant heads.

Source reference: p. 4–7

2. Whether the claimant was entitled to interest on the enhanced compensation for the period of delay in filing the appeal.

Source reference: p. 7
03

Law Applied

The appeal was brought under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

Source reference: p. 2

In assessing compensation, the Court applied the notional monthly income of ₹16,250 for an accident occurring in 2023, the multiplier of 14 appropriate to the claimant’s age, and a whole-body disability assessment of 11%—one-third of the assessed 32% limb disability.

Source reference: p. 4–6

The judgment cites no specific precedents.

Source reference: no citation
04

Reasoning

The Court found that the Tribunal had used monthly income of ₹16,000 rather than the applicable 2023 notional income of ₹16,250, and had assessed whole-body disability at 8% rather than 11%.

Source reference: p. 4–6

Applying the multiplier of 14, it recalculated loss of future income as ₹3,00,300 (₹16,250 × 12 × 14 × 11%).

Source reference: p. 6

It also enhanced pain and suffering to ₹45,000, amenities to ₹25,000, and incidental expenses to ₹15,000; awarded ₹48,750 for three months’ loss of income during the laid-up period; and left medical expenses at ₹10,830.

Source reference: p. 5–7

The Court separately applied the order excluding interest for the 313-day appeal delay.

Source reference: p. 7
05

Holding

The appeal was allowed in part.

The Court enhanced total compensation to ₹4,44,880, an increase of ₹1,59,010 over the Tribunal’s award, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the claim petition until realization, except for the 313-day delay period in filing the appeal.

Source reference: p. 7–8

The insurer was directed to deposit the enhanced amount with interest before the Tribunal within six weeks, and the claimant was permitted to withdraw the entire enhanced compensation.

Source reference: p. 8
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Motor Vehicles Act, 19881

Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

SRI PAVAN KvsSRI KARTHIK

Karnataka High Court · October 15, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment