Karnataka High Court
Transport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Law

Motor accident compensation must reflect revised notional income, future prospects, and consortium for eligible dependants.

KUM. SHWETHA SHREE. G vs M/S. JAI HIND LOGISTICS PVT. LTD.,

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: September 21, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Motor accident compensation must reflect revised notional income, future prospects, and consortium for eligible dependants.. KUM. SHWETHA SHREE. G vs M/S. JAI HIND LOGISTICS PVT. LTD.,. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The appellants, minor children of the deceased Smt. Jayalakshmi, appealed the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal’s award of Rs.12,34,864 for her death in a motor accident.

Source reference: p.3–4

The accident and the insurer’s liability were undisputed.

Source reference: p.3–4

The Tribunal had assessed the deceased’s notional income at Rs.6,500 per month and added 40% for future prospects.

Source reference: p.3–4

The appellants sought enhancement, contending that the notional income should have been assessed at Rs.8,000 per month

Source reference: p.3–4
02

Issues

1. Whether the Tribunal’s assessment of the deceased’s notional income and the resulting award for loss of dependency required enhancement

Source reference: p.4–5

2. Whether the appellants and the deceased’s husband were entitled to reassessed compensation under the heads of consortium, loss of estate, and funeral expenses

Source reference: p.5
03

Law Applied

The appeal was brought under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

Source reference: p.2

The Court applied the compensation principles reflected in the award: assessment of loss of dependency by reference to the deceased’s income, future prospects, deduction for personal expenses, and the applicable multiplier; and award of compensation under the heads of consortium, loss of estate, and funeral expenses

Source reference: p.4–5

The judgment cites no specific precedent or further statutory provision for these principles

Source reference: p.3–5
04

Reasoning

The Court accepted that, for an accident in 2013, the appellants’ proposed notional income of Rs.8,000 per month was appropriate, with 40% added for future prospects.

Source reference: p.4–5

It accordingly reassessed loss of dependency at Rs.14,33,664, replacing the Tribunal’s Rs.11,64,864 award under that head

Source reference: p.4–5

As the appellants were minors when their mother died, each was awarded Rs.44,000 for filial consortium; their father, the deceased’s husband, was also awarded Rs.44,000 for consortium.

Source reference: p.5

The Court further reassessed loss of estate and funeral expenses at Rs.16,500 each

Source reference: p.5
05

Holding

The appeal was allowed in part.

The Court enhanced the total compensation payable to the appellants and respondent No.3 from Rs.12,34,864 to Rs.15,98,664.

Source reference: p.5–7

The enhanced amount carries interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition until realization; apportionment remains as directed by the Tribunal.

Source reference: p.5–7

For each appellant, 50% of their entitlement is to be released with accrued interest, and the remaining 50% is to be kept in fixed deposit for three years

Source reference: p.5–7
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Motor Vehicles Act, 19881

Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

KUM. SHWETHA SHREE. GvsM/S. JAI HIND LOGISTICS PVT. LTD.,

Karnataka High Court · September 21, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment