Gujarat High Court

Motor Accident Compensation Reassessed Using Minimum Wages and National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi Guidelines

LALLUBHAI DUDHABHAI ROHIT vs ALLARAKHIYA MUKIM SAMA

Gujarat High CourtJUDGMENT: June 25, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

On December 17, 2018, Mayankkumar Lallubhai Rohit (aged 21) died following a vehicular accident involving a vehicle registered as GJ-12-BW-6107

Source reference: p. 2

The claimants (parents and brother) filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT), Kambay, partly allowed the petition in M.A.C.P. No. 193 of 2020, awarding Rs. 10,28,200/- with 9% interest

Source reference: p. 2

The claimants appealed to the High Court seeking enhancement of compensation, arguing that the deceased was a skilled ITI holder and that the Tribunal erred in its assessment of notional income and conventional heads

Source reference: p. 4
02

Issues

1. Whether the learned Tribunal erred in assessing the monthly income and future prospects of the deceased in the absence of cogent evidence of earnings

Source reference: p. 5

2. Whether the compensation awarded under conventional heads (loss of estate, funeral expenses, and consortium) was adequate as per established legal precedents

Source reference: p. 6
03

Law Applied

The Court primarily applied the principles of "just compensation" under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

Source reference: no citation

It followed the landmark precedent of National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi (2017) 16 SCC 680, which standardized the addition of 40% for future prospects for deceased individuals under 40 years of age and defined the amounts for conventional heads

Source reference: p. 4

Furthermore, it relied on Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Nanu Ram alias Chuhru Ram (2018) 18 SCC 130 regarding the entitlement of parents to "filial consortium"

Source reference: p. 6

The court also utilized the minimum wage notifications issued by the Government of Gujarat for skilled workers to determine notional income

Source reference: p. 5
04

Reasoning

The Court observed that while the claimants could not prove the deceased’s actual income of Rs. 10,000/-, the Tribunal’s assessment of Rs. 6,000/- was too low given the deceased’s status as a skilled worker (ITI course completed)

Source reference: p. 5

It held that the minimum wage for a skilled worker at the time of the accident (December 2018) was Rs. 8,560/- per month

Source reference: p. 6

Applying the Pranay Sethi guidelines, the Court added 40% for future prospects (Rs. 11,984/-), deducted 50% for personal expenses as the deceased was a bachelor (Rs. 5,992/-), and applied a multiplier of 18 (based on age 21), totaling Rs. 12,94,272/- for loss of dependency

Source reference: p. 6

Finally, the Court corrected the "meagre" conventional awards by increasing funeral expenses and loss of estate to Rs. 18,150/- each and awarding Rs. 96,800/- for filial consortium to the parents

Source reference: p. 7
05

Holding

The High Court partly allowed the appeal, holding that the claimants are entitled to a total compensation of Rs. 14,27,372/-, resulting in an enhancement of Rs. 3,99,172/- over the Tribunal’s award

The Court directed the Insurance Company to deposit the additional amount with 9% interest per annum within six weeks. The modified award includes Rs. 12,94,270/- for loss of dependency, Rs. 18,150/- for funeral expenses, Rs. 18,150/- for loss of estate, and Rs. 96,800/- for loss of consortium

Source reference: p. 7, 8
Gujarat High Court

Original Court PDF

LALLUBHAI DUDHABHAI ROHITvsALLARAKHIYA MUKIM SAMA

Gujarat High Court · June 25, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment