Odisha High Court
Administrative and Public LawCivil Procedure and Evidence

Municipal demolition notices issued without statutory show-cause opportunity violate natural justice and are invalid.

RAJ KUMAR AGRAWAL vs STATE OF ODISHA

Odisha High CourtJUDGMENT: October 13, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Municipal demolition notices issued without statutory show-cause opportunity violate natural justice and are invalid.. RAJ KUMAR AGRAWAL vs STATE OF ODISHA. Odisha High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The Executive Officer, NAC, Khariar issued notices dated 4 May 2026 to the petitioners, alleging that a house stair slope had been illegally constructed on an NAC road and obstructed public movement.

Source reference: p. 1

The notices required demolition within three days, failing which the NAC would demolish the construction.

Source reference: p. 1

The petitioners challenged the notices under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, contending that they had received no prior opportunity of hearing.

Source reference: p. 3–4

The Court considered the matter at the threshold of admission.

Source reference: p. 2
02

Issues

1. Whether the demolition notices were issued in conformity with the procedure prescribed by Section 249 of the Orissa Municipality Act, 1950.

Source reference: p. 2–3

2. Whether issuing notices requiring demolition without first providing the petitioners a reasonable opportunity to show cause violated the principles of natural justice.

Source reference: p. 4–5
03

Law Applied

Section 249(1) of the Orissa Municipality Act, 1950, as quoted by the Court, requires the Executive Officer to issue a notice enabling the alleged offender to show sufficient cause against alteration or demolition; under Section 249(2), an order directing alteration or demolition may follow if sufficient cause is not shown.

Source reference: p. 2–3

The Court applied the principle that an authority must act within the procedure prescribed by statute and afford a reasonable opportunity of hearing before taking action adversely affecting a person.

Source reference: p. 5
04

Reasoning

The notices did not invite the petitioners to show cause as contemplated by Section 249; instead, they required demolition within three days and threatened demolition by the NAC.

Source reference: p. 2–5

The Executive Officer had proceeded directly to a demolition demand without first following the statutory show-cause procedure.

Source reference: p. 2–5

The Court therefore held that the authority had acted beyond its jurisdiction and contrary to the Act, and that the absence of a reasonable opportunity also violated natural justice.

Source reference: p. 2–5
05

Holding

The Court allowed the writ petition and quashed the notices issued under Annexure-3.

It remitted the matter for fresh disposal and directed the Executive Officer, NAC, Khariar, to serve fresh notice on the petitioners and provide them a reasonable opportunity of hearing in accordance with law.

Source reference: p. 5

The petitioners were directed to cooperate.

Source reference: p. 5
06

Acts & Sections Cited

3 provisions across 2 statutes referred to in this judgment. Linked provisions open on LawLens.

Orissa Municipal Act, 19502

Section 248Section 249

Municipal Rule, 19501

Section 248
Odisha High Court

Original Court PDF

RAJ KUMAR AGRAWALvsSTATE OF ODISHA

Odisha High Court · October 13, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment