Facts
The Executive Officer, NAC, Khariar issued notices dated 4 May 2026 to the petitioners, alleging that a house stair slope had been illegally constructed on an NAC road and obstructed public movement.
Source reference: p. 1The notices required demolition within three days, failing which the NAC would demolish the construction.
Source reference: p. 1The petitioners challenged the notices under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, contending that they had received no prior opportunity of hearing.
Source reference: p. 3–4The Court considered the matter at the threshold of admission.
Source reference: p. 2Issues
1. Whether the demolition notices were issued in conformity with the procedure prescribed by Section 249 of the Orissa Municipality Act, 1950.
Source reference: p. 2–32. Whether issuing notices requiring demolition without first providing the petitioners a reasonable opportunity to show cause violated the principles of natural justice.
Source reference: p. 4–5Law Applied
Section 249(1) of the Orissa Municipality Act, 1950, as quoted by the Court, requires the Executive Officer to issue a notice enabling the alleged offender to show sufficient cause against alteration or demolition; under Section 249(2), an order directing alteration or demolition may follow if sufficient cause is not shown.
Source reference: p. 2–3The Court applied the principle that an authority must act within the procedure prescribed by statute and afford a reasonable opportunity of hearing before taking action adversely affecting a person.
Source reference: p. 5Reasoning
The notices did not invite the petitioners to show cause as contemplated by Section 249; instead, they required demolition within three days and threatened demolition by the NAC.
Source reference: p. 2–5The Executive Officer had proceeded directly to a demolition demand without first following the statutory show-cause procedure.
Source reference: p. 2–5The Court therefore held that the authority had acted beyond its jurisdiction and contrary to the Act, and that the absence of a reasonable opportunity also violated natural justice.
Source reference: p. 2–5Holding
The Court allowed the writ petition and quashed the notices issued under Annexure-3.
It remitted the matter for fresh disposal and directed the Executive Officer, NAC, Khariar, to serve fresh notice on the petitioners and provide them a reasonable opportunity of hearing in accordance with law.
Source reference: p. 5The petitioners were directed to cooperate.
Source reference: p. 5Acts & Sections Cited
3 provisions across 2 statutes referred to in this judgment. Linked provisions open on LawLens.
Orissa Municipal Act, 19502
Municipal Rule, 19501
Original Court PDF
RAJ KUMAR AGRAWALvsSTATE OF ODISHA
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
