Chhattisgarh High Court
Administrative and Public LawElection Law

Non-Speaking Order Removing Cooperative Society Voters Must Be Set Aside.

JAGANNATH PRASAD RATRE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: September 29, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Non-Speaking Order Removing Cooperative Society Voters Must Be Set Aside.. JAGANNATH PRASAD RATRE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioner, President of a cooperative society, challenged the Joint Registrar’s order allowing Respondent No. 10’s appeal concerning the eligibility of members listed at Serial Nos. 30–54 in the society’s provisional voter list.

Source reference: para. 2–4

The petitioner’s challenge before the State Cooperative Tribunal was dismissed at the motion stage on maintainability grounds.

Source reference: para. 2–4

In the writ petition, the petitioner also contended that Rule 49 of the Chhattisgarh Cooperative Societies Rules, 1962 made the First Appellate Authority’s election-related order final and non-appealable.

Source reference: para. 2–4
02

Issues

Whether the Joint Registrar’s order directing removal of members from the voter list was sustainable despite giving no reasons for that direction.

Source reference: para. 5

Whether the petitioner’s other challenges, including the Tribunal’s dismissal of the appeal and the Joint Registrar’s jurisdiction to entertain the appeal, required determination in the writ petition.

Source reference: paras. 3–5
03

Law Applied

The dispute arose under the Chhattisgarh Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 and the Chhattisgarh Cooperative Societies Rules, 1962; the petitioner relied on Rule 49 to argue that the First Appellate Authority’s decision on the election process was final and non-appealable.

Source reference: para. 3

The Court did not decide that statutory interpretation or identify any precedent.

Source reference: para. 3

It applied the requirement that an order affecting members’ inclusion in a voter list must give reasons, and directed that reconsideration be conducted in accordance with law after hearing the petitioner and other interested parties.

Source reference: paras. 5–7
04

Reasoning

The Joint Registrar had directed the removal of members listed at Serial Nos. 30–54 but had not stated the reasons for doing so.

Source reference: paras. 5–8

The Court therefore held that the order was non-speaking and could not stand.

Source reference: paras. 5–8

Rather than deciding the merits of the membership dispute or the petitioner’s jurisdictional and maintainability arguments, it remitted the matter for a fresh, reasoned decision after hearing the affected parties.

Source reference: paras. 5–8
05

Holding

The Court set aside the Joint Registrar’s order dated 10 January 2020 and remanded the matter for fresh consideration in accordance with law, with an opportunity of hearing for the petitioner and all interested parties.

The petitioner was directed to appear before the Joint Registrar within 15 days of receiving a certified copy, and the Joint Registrar was directed to decide the matter expeditiously.

Source reference: para. 8

The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.

Source reference: para. 9
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

JAGANNATH PRASAD RATREvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · September 29, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment