Uttarakhand High Court
Employment and Labour LawAdministrative and Public Law

Officials directed to expedite the pending minimum-pay-scale proposal within six weeks.

POOJA NEGI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Uttarakhand High CourtJUDGMENT: October 14, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Officials directed to expedite the pending minimum-pay-scale proposal within six weeks.. POOJA NEGI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND. Uttarakhand High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioner was initially engaged on daily wages as a Record Clerk for 42 days from 1 March 2012 and claimed that she had continued against a sanctioned post without receiving the minimum of the applicable pay scale

Source reference: para. 4–5

She relied on a Government Order dated 2 July 2026, which provided initial pay attached to the post for contractual, daily-wage, or consolidated-pay incumbents, and also sought Dearness Allowance

Source reference: para. 3, 6

The State informed the Court that she was still working on a daily-wage basis, that 277 incumbents had received the minimum pay scale under the Government Order, and that her proposal was pending before the Finance Department following a recommendation by the institution’s Principal

Source reference: para. 7–8
02

Issues

Whether the petitioner’s claim for the minimum of the Record Clerk pay scale and Dearness Allowance should be granted in the petition

Source reference: para. 3, 5–6

Whether the respondents should be directed to pursue and expedite the petitioner’s pending proposal before the Finance Department

Source reference: para. 7–10
03

Law Applied

The Court referred to the Government Order dated 2 July 2026, which provided for payment of the initial pay attached to the relevant post to contractual, daily-wage, or consolidated-pay incumbents

Source reference: para. 6

The Court did not determine the petitioner’s substantive entitlement to the claimed pay-scale or Dearness Allowance; it issued a procedural direction to pursue the pending proposal

Source reference: para. 9–11
04

Reasoning

The State’s instructions confirmed that the petitioner continued on daily wages and that her proposal, supported by the Principal’s recommendation, was pending before the Finance Department

Source reference: para. 7–8

Because that proposal had not yet been decided, the Court did not adjudicate whether the petitioner was entitled to the claimed benefits. Instead, it directed the official respondents to pursue the matter and make efforts to expedite its consideration

Source reference: para. 9–10
05

Holding

The petition was disposed of finally, without a determination on the merits of the petitioner’s claims for the minimum pay scale or Dearness Allowance.

The Secretary, Medical Education, the Director, Medical Education, and the Principal of the institution were directed to pursue the pending matter before the Finance Department and make all possible efforts to expedite it within six weeks from presentation of a certified copy of the order

Source reference: para. 9–11
Uttarakhand High Court

Original Court PDF

POOJA NEGIvsSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Uttarakhand High Court · October 14, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment