Facts
The petitioner challenged the judgment dated 28.02.2019 passed by the Foreigners' Tribunal No. 5, Darrang, which declared her a foreign national of the post-25.03.1971 stream
Source reference: p. 3The case originated from a 2006 police enquiry raising suspicions about her nationality
Source reference: p. 3To prove Indian citizenship, the petitioner claimed linkage to her father, Nur Islam (voters list 1993), and grandfather, Akash Ali (voters list 1966)
Source reference: p. 3, 4She submitted school certificates (Exhibit 3) and Gaon Panchayat certificates (Exhibits 7 & 8) to establish this relationship
Source reference: p. 6The Tribunal rejected these documents because the authors were not produced to prove the contents, and oral testimonies were deemed insufficient
Source reference: p. 3, 6Issues
1. Whether the petitioner successfully discharged the burden of proof to establish her linkage with an Indian ancestor prior to 25.03.1971 under the Foreigners Act, 1946
Source reference: p. 52. Whether the Tribunal erred in law by discarding certified copies of the electoral rolls and other certificates on the grounds of lack of proof of contents
Source reference: p. 3, 6Law Applied
The court applied Section 9 of the Foreigners Act, 1946, which places the burden of proving citizenship on the proceedee
Source reference: p. 5Under Section 74, 76, and 79 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, the court addressed the presumption of genuineness for certified copies of public documents
Source reference: p. 3the court primarily relied on the principle that mere production of documents is not proof of their contents without testimony from authors, as established in L.I.C. v. Ram Pal Singh Bisen
Source reference: p. 3relying on Bijoy Das v. Union of India, the court emphasized that oral testimony alone is insufficient to discharge the burden of proof in citizenship cases without reliable documentary linkage
Source reference: p. 5Reasoning
The High Court examined whether the petitioner established a "documentary link" to her projected ancestors. While Exhibit 1 (1966 voters list) showed Akash Ali as an Indian citizen, the petitioner failed to prove Nur Islam was her father or that Nur Islam was the son of Akash Ali
Source reference: p. 5, 6The 1993 voters list showed Nur Islam appearing for the first time at age 30, which the court found did not automatically establish a link
Source reference: p. 6The school and Gaon Panchayat certificates (Exhibits 3, 7, and 8) were rightly discarded by the Tribunal because their authors did not depose to verify the contents
Source reference: p. 6The court held that without these certificates, the petitioner's case rested solely on oral evidence (DW-1 and DW-2), which is legally insufficient to prove citizenship lineage
Source reference: p. 6, 7Holding
The Court answered the issues in the negative, holding that the petitioner failed to discharge her burden of proof.
The High Court upheld the Foreigners' Tribunal's decision, finding no perversity or misreading of evidence. The writ petition was dismissed, the interim protection was vacated, and the petitioner was confirmed to be a foreign national
Source reference: p. 7Original Court PDF
Alesha Khatun @ Alesha BegumvsThe Union Of India And 5 Ors.
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in