Facts
Anwer Hussain K.K., a Mechanic Grade A, challenged a transfer order (Annexure A3) issued by the 4th respondent
Source reference: p.3The Original Application was filed in response to this order
Source reference: p.2During the hearing, the learned Standing Counsel for the Lakshadweep Administration presented a corrigendum dated February 13, 2026, issued by the Director (Industries), which partially cancelled the Annexure A3 order to the extent of transferring the applicant
Source reference: p.2Issues
Whether the Original Application challenging the transfer order had become infructuous due to the partial cancellation of the transfer order by the administration
Source reference: p.2Law Applied
The court applied the principle that an application becomes infructuous when the underlying cause of action or the relief sought has been nullified or rendered unnecessary by subsequent events
Source reference: p.2Reasoning
Upon the production of the corrigendum dated February 13, 2026, which cancelled the applicant's transfer as per Annexure A3, the very basis of the Original Application ceased to exist
Source reference: p.2The learned Counsel for the applicant explicitly confirmed that, in light of this development, the O.A. had become infructuous
Source reference: p.2This established that the relief sought by the applicant, which was to challenge the transfer, was no longer required as the transfer itself had been cancelled by the respondent's own action
Source reference: p.2Holding
The Tribunal concluded that the Original Application had become infructuous due to the issuance of the corrigendum cancelling the applicant's transfer
Accordingly, the Original Application was closed with no order as to costs
Source reference: p.2Original Court PDF
Anwer Hussain K.K. v. Union of India [Original Application No. 181/00492/2025]
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in