Facts
The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus preventing the respondents from collecting current-consumption charges, demand charges, or arrears for its HTSC No. 039094380746 until the respondents paid or adjusted ₹1,03,698 allegedly due to it for 2025–2026.
Source reference: p. 2At admission, counsel for both sides submitted that the issue had been addressed in earlier cases. The Court referred to an earlier order in W.P. No. 38309 of 2024, which applied directions issued in M/s. Rajaguru Spinning Mills P. Ltd. v. Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission and related cases.
Source reference: pp. 2–5Issues
Whether the respondents should adjust the ₹1,03,698 allegedly due to the petitioner against its current-consumption and demand charges.
Source reference: p. 2Whether the respondents should be restrained from taking coercive steps to disconnect the petitioner’s electricity supply until that amount is fully adjusted.
Source reference: pp. 4–5Law Applied
The Court followed its earlier directions in M/s. Rajaguru Spinning Mills P. Ltd. v. Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission, W.P. Nos. 6776 of 2020 and connected cases, as applied in subsequent matters.
Source reference: pp. 4–5Those directions provide that any outstanding amount due to a petitioner may be adjusted against current-consumption or open-access charges until exhausted, and that electricity supply should not be disconnected while the adjustment remains incomplete.
Source reference: pp. 4–5Reasoning
The Court treated the petitioner’s claim as governed by the earlier decisions addressing the same adjustment and disconnection issues.
Source reference: p. 2Rather than separately examining the underlying account or the amount claimed, it adopted the terms of the prior orders and applied them to this petition.
Source reference: p. 5Holding
The writ petition was disposed of on the same terms as the earlier cases. The respondents were directed to adjust ₹1,03,698 against the petitioner’s current-consumption and demand charges until the amount was exhausted, and not to take coercive steps to disconnect the electricity supply until then.
No costs were ordered, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.
Source reference: p. 5Original Court PDF
M/s. Manchester Textiles P Ltd.vsTamilnadu Electricity Regulatory Commission,
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
