Chhattisgarh High Court
Criminal Procedure and EvidenceCriminal Law

Parity and a limited role as a peon justify grant of regular bail.

TANISHA BAGHEL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: October 05, 20261 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Parity and a limited role as a peon justify grant of regular bail.. TANISHA BAGHEL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in Crime No. 07/2025, registered at Police Station Sakti for alleged offences under Sections 318(2), 318(4), 111(1), and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and Sections 6 and 10 of the Chhattisgarh Protection of Depositors Interest Act, 2005.

Source reference: para. 1

The prosecution alleged that the applicant and others, associated with Flora Max Foundation, induced women to take bank loans and deposit the proceeds with the company in return for business goods and monthly payments; the company later closed its office, allegedly leaving a loss of Rs. 38,70,000.

Source reference: para. 2

The applicant maintained that she had worked only as a peon and had no role in the transactions.

Source reference: para. 3

She relied on parity, stating that five co-accused had been granted bail, and submitted that she had been in custody since 4 August 2026 and that trial would take time.

Source reference: para. 3

The State opposed bail but did not dispute that co-accused had been released.

Source reference: para. 4
02

Issues

1. Whether the applicant should be released on regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, having regard to her alleged role, parity with bailed co-accused, custody, and likely duration of trial.

Source reference: paras. 1, 3–6
03

Law Applied

Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, provides the basis for the High Court’s consideration of an application for regular bail.

Source reference: para. 1

In deciding the application, the Court considered the nature of the allegations, the role attributed to the applicant, parity with co-accused already released on bail, the period of custody

04

Acts & Sections Cited

4 provisions across 2 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20231

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 20233

Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

TANISHA BAGHELvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · October 05, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment