CAT - ['Delhi']

Past service in parental department must be considered for promotion eligibility upon permanent absorption in NIA.

Vijay Kumar vs UNION OF INDIA

CAT - ['Delhi']JUDGMENT: May 05, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant, Vijay Kumar, was originally a member of the Himachal Pradesh Police before being permanently absorbed into the National Investigation Agency (NIA) on February 9, 2017

Source reference: p. 2, para. 2

He approached the Tribunal seeking a direction to the respondents to count his past service in the Himachal Pradesh Police (from February 10, 2014, to February 9, 2017) for the purposes of promotion to the grades of Inspector and Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) in the NIA

Source reference: p. 2

The applicant had previously filed representations regarding this service credit on August 23, 2023, and December 30, 2025, which remained pending with the authorities

Source reference: p. 2-3, para. 3
02

Issues

1. Whether the respondents should be directed to consider the applicant's past service for promotion purposes and decide his pending representations within a specific timeframe

Source reference: p. 3, para. 3-5
03

Law Applied

The court primarily exercised its jurisdiction under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985

Source reference: p. 2, para. 2

It applied the principle of natural justice, which necessitates that administrative authorities consider and decide representations made by employees regarding their service conditions through reasoned and speaking orders

Source reference: p. 3, para. 5
04

Reasoning

The Tribunal did not adjudicate upon the substantive merits of the applicant’s claim regarding the counting of past service. Instead, it focused on the procedural lapse of the respondents in not deciding the applicant’s existing representations dated August 23, 2023, and December 30, 2025

Source reference: p. 3, para. 5

Noticing that the applicant limited his prayer to the disposal of these representations and that the respondents’ counsel agreed to consider them in accordance with the law, the Tribunal found it appropriate to dispose of the matter at the admission stage

Source reference: p. 3, para. 4-7

The court reasoned that a time-bound direction to the competent authority to pass a "reasoned and speaking order" would satisfy the requirements of justice without the court pre-judging the merits of the promotion claims

Source reference: p. 3-4, para. 5-6
05

Holding

The Tribunal disposed of the Original Application at the admission stage without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case

It directed the competent authority among the respondents to consider and decide the applicant's pending representations (dated 23.08.2023 and 30.12.2025) by passing a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with the law within four weeks from the receipt of the certified copy of the order

Source reference: p. 3, para. 5

All pending Miscellaneous Applications were also disposed of with no order as to costs

Source reference: p. 4, para. 8-9
CAT - ['Delhi']

Original Court PDF

Vijay KumarvsUNION OF INDIA

CAT - ['Delhi'] · May 05, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment