Chhattisgarh High Court
Employment and Labour LawAdministrative and Public Law

Pay-fixation grievances must be decided by the competent authority through a reasoned order after hearing.

JAIPAL SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: October 05, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Pay-fixation grievances must be decided by the competent authority through a reasoned order after hearing.. JAIPAL SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioners, Panchayat Secretaries, challenged the fixation of their pay and consequential recovery in earlier proceedings, W.P.(S) No. 9532 of 2019 and connected matters.

Source reference: para. 2

By order dated 24 February 2026, the Court permitted the petitioners in those proceedings to make representations and directed the competent authority to decide them by a reasoned order after hearing them.

Source reference: para. 2

A representation submitted by one of those petitioners was forwarded to the Secretary, Panchayat and Rural Development Department, after the authority receiving it stated that it was not competent to decide the grievance.

Source reference: para. 2

The grievance remained undecided.

Source reference: para. 2

In this petition, the petitioners sought permission to submit a fresh representation to the Principal Secretary, and the State submitted that it would be decided within 40 days of receipt.

Source reference: paras. 2–4
02

Issues

Whether the petitioners should be permitted to submit a fresh representation to the Principal Secretary concerning pay fixation, grade pay and consequential recovery.

Source reference: paras. 3, 6

Whether the competent authority should be directed to decide that representation by a reasoned and speaking order after providing an opportunity of hearing.

Source reference: paras. 4, 6
03

Law Applied

The Court identified no specific statute or precedent as the basis for its decision.

Source reference: no citation

It applied the procedural direction in its earlier order dated 24 February 2026, under which the competent authority was to consider the representation, afford an opportunity of hearing, and issue a reasoned and speaking order.

Source reference: para. 2

The Court also relied on the State’s submission that a fresh representation would be decided within 40 days.

Source reference: para. 4
04

Reasoning

The Court found that the petitioners’ grievance regarding pay fixation and recovery remained unresolved, notwithstanding the earlier proceedings and the forwarding of a representation to the competent authority.

Source reference: paras. 2, 5

In light of the parties’ submissions, it permitted a fresh representation supported by the earlier orders and relevant documents, and directed the Principal Secretary to decide it after hearing the petitioners and by a reasoned and speaking order.

Source reference: paras. 3–6
05

Holding

The Court disposed of the writ petition, permitting the petitioners to submit a fresh representation to respondent No. 1 within two weeks.

If filed within that period, the representation must be decided in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order within 40 days of receipt, after affording the petitioners an opportunity of hearing.

Source reference: paras. 6–7
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

JAIPAL SAHUvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · October 05, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment