Facts
The appellant filed an appeal under Section 82 of the Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948, challenging the Employees’ Insurance Court, Labour Court, Bilaspur’s order dated 20 January 2023.
Source reference: para. 2During the appeal, ESIC introduced the New Amnesty Scheme, 2025, and the appellant sought permission to avail its benefits.
Source reference: paras. 3–4The appellant relied on this Court’s order in Vandana Global Limited v. Deputy Director, ESIC; ESIC did not oppose the application.
Source reference: paras. 3–4Issues
Whether the appellant should be permitted to withdraw the appeal and seek settlement under the New Amnesty Scheme, 2025.
Source reference: paras. 3, 6–7Whether the appellant should be permitted to seek restoration of the appeal if ESIC does not proceed under the Scheme.
Source reference: para. 9Law Applied
Section 82 of the Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948, provides for an appeal from an order of the Employees’ Insurance Court; the underlying dispute concerned the Act, including the settlement provisions referenced in the New Amnesty Scheme.
Source reference: paras. 2, 6Under the Scheme, specified contribution disputes pending before the Employees’ Insurance Court, in an appeal under Section 82, or in qualifying proceedings under Article 226 may be settled, subject to the employer seeking the court’s permission, applying in the prescribed form, and complying with the Scheme’s payment and other conditions.
Source reference: para. 6The Scheme also provides that damages will not be levied in an eligible settlement.
Source reference: para. 6Reasoning
The Court considered the Scheme’s provisions, the appellant’s request to pursue settlement, and ESIC’s lack of objection.
Source reference: paras. 4–6It permitted withdrawal of the appeal so that the appellant could apply to the competent authority under the Scheme.
Source reference: para. 7The Court did not itself determine the appellant’s eligibility or the amount payable; it left the application to be decided by the competent authority in accordance with law.
Source reference: para. 7Holding
The Court disposed of the appeal, permitting the appellant to withdraw it and apply to the competent authority under the New Amnesty Scheme, 2025, within 30 days.
The competent authority was directed to decide any such application in accordance with law.
Source reference: paras. 7–9The appellant was granted liberty to seek restoration of the appeal if ESIC did not proceed under the Scheme.
Source reference: paras. 7–9Acts & Sections Cited
4 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Linked provisions open on LawLens.
Employees4
Original Court PDF
M/S SUBHA HONDA, KARAN CITY AUTO MOBILES PVT. LTD.vsEMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
