Facts
The petitioners, claiming to be valid Tehbazari license holders and vendors in the Timarpur area, challenged a demolition and removal drive conducted by the Public Works Department (PWD) and the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) on February 5, 2026
Source reference: para 2, 5The petitioners sought the restoration of their vending sites, asserting they held valid licenses expiring in March 2026
Source reference: para 3, 6The PWD contended that the vends were encroaching upon public land and drains, causing severe waterlogging by blocking manholes
Source reference: para 8, 11Conversely, the MCD alleged that the licenses relied upon by several petitioners were fabricated through the connivance of "unscrupulous officials" within the department
Source reference: para 12, 20Procedurally, the Court had previously directed status reports and the formation of an Inquiry Committee by the MCD to verify the authenticity of the vendors' documents
Source reference: para 8, 22Issues
1. Whether the removal of the petitioners’ tehbazari vends was legally justified on the grounds of public interest and infrastructure maintenance?
Source reference: para 15-182. Whether the tehbazari licenses produced by the petitioners are genuine or the result of administrative fraud and collusion?
Source reference: para 19-203. What measures must be taken against officials involved in the potential fabrication of vending rights?
Source reference: para 27-28Law Applied
The Court emphasized that Tehbazari rights are purely temporary and subject to the condition that the site must be vacated for government work or public interest
Source reference: para 13The Court exercised its writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to oversee administrative accountability
Source reference: para 28It further relied on the statutory framework governing the MCD and the mandate of the Town Vending Committee to regulate street vending in accordance with the relevant Acts and Rules
Source reference: para 24Reasoning
The Court perused the PWD’s affidavit and photographic evidence, which conclusively demonstrated that the vendors had occupied road surfaces and blocked manholes, leading to choked sewage systems and severe waterlogging
Source reference: para 14-15It reasoned that anti-encroachment drives are "absolutely essential" to prevent civic crises during the rainy season, noting that public infrastructure maintenance outweighs individual vending claims
Source reference: para 17-18Regarding the licenses, the Court found the MCD’s admission of internal "unscrupulous activities" alarming
Source reference: para 20, 25It determined that the petitioners could not claim valid rights until a Fact-Finding Committee verified the authenticity of their documents against official records
Source reference: para 24, 26The Court expanded the Committee’s scope to identify and recommend action against erring officials to ensure administrative integrity
Source reference: para 28-29Holding
The High Court disposed of the writ petitions by upholding the removal drive and refusing to permit the re-installation of vends in the Timarpur area until the Committee's report is furnished
The Court directed the Scrutiny Committee to complete its inquiry into the authenticity of the licenses and the conduct of officials within one month
Source reference: para 29If petitioners are subsequently found to be valid license holders, the Court reserved the right to consider their relocation
Source reference: para 30The PWD was directed to proceed with desilting and road restoration
Source reference: para 32The SHO of PS Timarpur was ordered to ensure no vending activities resume in the interim
Source reference: para 35Compliance report is due by May 22, 2026
Source reference: para 36Original Court PDF
Ashok KumarvsPublic Works Department And Ors.
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in