Facts
A search and seizure operation under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act") was conducted on 08.09.2021
Source reference: p. 1-2, para 2.1Consequent to this search, the Respondent issued a notice under Section 148 on 24.02.2023 to the Petitioner seeking to reopen the assessment for the Assessment Year (AY) 2012-13
Source reference: para 2.2The Petitioner challenged the notice on the ground of limitation
Source reference: para 3Issues
1. Whether the impugned notice under Section 148 for Assessment Year 2012-13 is barred by limitation under the provisions of Section 149 read with Section 153A of the Act
Source reference: para 3Law Applied
The Court applied the "Old Regime" of Section 149, as Section 152(3) mandates that for searches conducted between April 1, 2021, and September 1, 2024, Sections 147–151 as they stood prior to the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024, apply
Source reference: para 7Under Section 153A(1)(b), the Assessing Officer (AO) can assess six years immediately preceding the search year and any "relevant assessment year"
Source reference: para 8.1Explanation 1 to Section 153A defines "relevant assessment year" as one falling beyond six but not later than ten assessment years from the "end of the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which search is conducted"
Source reference: para 8.1The Court relied on Ojjus Medicare (P) Ltd. (Delhi High Court) and A.R. Safiullah (Madras High Court) to interpret the different computation modes for the six-year and ten-year block periods
Source reference: para 8.2Reasoning
The Court noted that the search occurred on 08.09.2021 (FY 2021-22), making AY 2022-23 the "search assessment year"
Source reference: para 8.3Per Explanation 1 to Section 153A, the ten-year limit must be reckoned backwards from the end of the search assessment year (31.03.2023)
Source reference: para 8.2While the six-year block excludes the search year, the ten-year block includes it as the first year in the calculation
Source reference: para 8.2, 8.3Applying this backward computation: the 1st year is AY 2022-23, and the 10th year is AY 2013-14
Source reference: para 8.3Therefore, AY 2012-13 falls outside the permissible ten-year window
Source reference: para 8.3The Court rejected the Revenue’s argument that "end" should be construed as April 1st, holding that taxing statutes must be strictly construed and an unambiguous provision cannot be elastically interpreted
Source reference: para 5.5, 8.2Holding
The Court held that the notice for AY 2012-13 was barred by limitation
The "relevant assessment year" reachable under search-related reopening cannot extend beyond ten years from the end of the search assessment year
Source reference: para 8.3The impugned notice dated 24.02.2023 was quashed and set aside
Source reference: para 9Rule made absolute
Source reference: para 9Original Court PDF
Manojbhai Bhupatbhai Vadodaria v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 2(4), Ahmedabad (R/Special Civil Application No. 9447 of 2023)
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in