Facts
The petitioner challenged an order passed under Section 148A(d) and a consequential notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dated 22.07.2022 for Assessment Year 2014-2015
Source reference: para. 2Initially, the respondent issued a notice on 21.06.2021 under the old regime, leveraging the extension provided by the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Ordinance/Act, 2020 (TOLA)
Source reference: para. 3Following the Supreme Court's mandate in Ashish Agarwal, this notice was treated as a show-cause notice under the new Section 148A(b)
Source reference: para. 4Information was provided to the petitioner on 26.05.2022, and the final reassessment notice was issued on 22.07.2022
Source reference: para. 7The petitioner contended the notice was time-barred under the "surviving time" principle
Source reference: para. 2Issues
Whether the notice issued under Section 148 of the Act dated 22.07.2022 was barred by limitation considering the "surviving time" available to the Revenue after the Ashish Agarwal judgment
Source reference: paras. 5-7Law Applied
The Court applied the "surviving time" principle established by the Supreme Court in Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal
Source reference: para. 5This principle dictates that for reassessment notices issued under the transition from the old to the new regime (post-Ashish Agarwal), the Assessing Officer must issue the Section 148 notice within the specific number of days remaining (the "surviving time") in the limitation period as it stood on the date of the original TOLA notice
Source reference: paras. 5, 9The Court further relied on its own coordinate bench decision in Dhanraj Govindram Kella v. ITO, which interpreted the computation of these timelines for Assessment Years 2013-14 and 2014-15
Source reference: para. 6Reasoning
The Court calculated the specific limitation period for the petitioner’s case. The original notice under the old regime was issued on 21.06.2021, leaving 9 days of "surviving time" before the TOLA deadline of 30.06.2021
Source reference: para. 7Following the procedure in Rajeev Bansal, the "stay" on the limitation period was lifted once the Revenue provided information (26.05.2022) and the mandatory two-week response period for the assessee expired (08.06.2022)
Source reference: para. 7Consequently, adding the 9 days of surviving time to 09.06.2022, the last date for the Revenue to validly issue the Section 148 notice was 18.06.2022
Source reference: para. 7Since the impugned notice was issued on 22.07.2022, it fell outside the surviving period
Source reference: para. 9The Revenue could not controvert these factual dates
Source reference: para. 8Holding
The Court held that the impugned notice was invalid and time-barred as it was issued beyond the "surviving time" prescribed by the Supreme Court
The Court quashed and set aside the order under Section 148A(d) dated 22.07.2022, the notice under Section 148 dated 22.07.2022, and all consequential reassessment proceedings. Rule was made absolute
Source reference: para. 10Original Court PDF
BALUBHAI KESHAVBHAI PATELvsTHE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(2)(1), SURAT
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in