Facts
The applicant, a 62-year-old retired employee of the Public Works Department (PWD), challenged a communication dated 25.04.2023.
Source reference: p. 2The respondents had sought to recover excess payments and withhold retiral benefits based on a dispute involving SRO 59.
Source reference: p. 2-3The applicant sought the release of his full pension, gratuity, and other allied retiral benefits, arguing that the impugned communication was arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.
Source reference: p. 2Issues
Whether the respondents are permitted to recover excess amounts already paid to the employee and whether the applicant is entitled to the release of withheld retiral benefits in light of settled law.
Source reference: p. 3Law Applied
The Tribunal applied the legal principles established by the Hon’ble High Court of Jammu & Kashmir in UT of J&K & Ors. vs. Maqbool Sheikh & Ors., WP(C) No. 936/2025.
Source reference: p. 3While the State has the liberty to re-fix pay or pension by excluding wrongly granted benefits, it is impermissible to effect any recovery of excess amounts already paid to employees.
Source reference: para. 42 of cited judgment, p. 3The law mandates the refund of any such amounts if already recovered.
Source reference: p. 3Reasoning
The Tribunal noted that the controversy regarding SRO 59 is no longer res integra (an open question), as it was conclusively settled by the High Court in the Maqbool Sheikh case.
Source reference: p. 2-3Applying that precedent to the present facts, the Tribunal found that a "plain reading" of the High Court’s judgment prohibits the respondents from making recoveries of excess payments from the applicant.
Source reference: p. 3While the respondents retain the legal right to re-fix the applicant's pay and pension prospectively by correcting errors in benefit allocation, they cannot obstruct the release of retiral benefits or withhold gratuity based on past excess payments.
Source reference: p. 3-4Holding
The Tribunal disposed of the Original Application by directing the respondents to settle the applicant's claim in accordance with the Maqbool Sheikh judgment.
The respondents were ordered to forward the applicant's complete service record and revised Last Pay Certificate to the Office of the Accountant General for re-fixation and the subsequent release of all retiral benefits and gratuity within four weeks.
Source reference: p. 4Original Court PDF
RASHPAL CHANDvsPUBLIC WORK DEPARTMENT R AND B
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in