CAT - ['Jammu']

Recovery of excess salary/pension paid is impermissible, though respondents may re-fix pay to exclude wrongly granted benefits.

RASHPAL CHAND vs PUBLIC WORK DEPARTMENT R AND B

CAT - ['Jammu']JUDGMENT: April 28, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant, a 62-year-old retired employee of the Public Works Department (PWD), challenged a communication dated 25.04.2023.

Source reference: p. 2

The respondents had sought to recover excess payments and withhold retiral benefits based on a dispute involving SRO 59.

Source reference: p. 2-3

The applicant sought the release of his full pension, gratuity, and other allied retiral benefits, arguing that the impugned communication was arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

Source reference: p. 2
02

Issues

Whether the respondents are permitted to recover excess amounts already paid to the employee and whether the applicant is entitled to the release of withheld retiral benefits in light of settled law.

Source reference: p. 3
03

Law Applied

The Tribunal applied the legal principles established by the Hon’ble High Court of Jammu & Kashmir in UT of J&K & Ors. vs. Maqbool Sheikh & Ors., WP(C) No. 936/2025.

Source reference: p. 3

While the State has the liberty to re-fix pay or pension by excluding wrongly granted benefits, it is impermissible to effect any recovery of excess amounts already paid to employees.

Source reference: para. 42 of cited judgment, p. 3

The law mandates the refund of any such amounts if already recovered.

Source reference: p. 3
04

Reasoning

The Tribunal noted that the controversy regarding SRO 59 is no longer res integra (an open question), as it was conclusively settled by the High Court in the Maqbool Sheikh case.

Source reference: p. 2-3

Applying that precedent to the present facts, the Tribunal found that a "plain reading" of the High Court’s judgment prohibits the respondents from making recoveries of excess payments from the applicant.

Source reference: p. 3

While the respondents retain the legal right to re-fix the applicant's pay and pension prospectively by correcting errors in benefit allocation, they cannot obstruct the release of retiral benefits or withhold gratuity based on past excess payments.

Source reference: p. 3-4
05

Holding

The Tribunal disposed of the Original Application by directing the respondents to settle the applicant's claim in accordance with the Maqbool Sheikh judgment.

The respondents were ordered to forward the applicant's complete service record and revised Last Pay Certificate to the Office of the Accountant General for re-fixation and the subsequent release of all retiral benefits and gratuity within four weeks.

Source reference: p. 4
CAT - ['Jammu']

Original Court PDF

RASHPAL CHANDvsPUBLIC WORK DEPARTMENT R AND B

CAT - ['Jammu'] · April 28, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment