Facts
The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing respondents 2 to 4 to decide the second petitioner’s representation dated 6 April 2026.
Source reference: para. 1In an earlier petition, W.P. No. 4713 of 2023, the Court had directed the Registrar of Societies to consider a complaint concerning alleged omissions and commissions by office bearers of the Indian Medical Association, Tamil Nadu State Branch.
Source reference: para. 1Following an enquiry, the Registrar issued an order on 19 March 2024 containing seven findings or directions; some matters were left to civil or criminal remedies, while further action was directed on others.
Source reference: paras. 1–4The petitioners contended that the further action remained incomplete.
Source reference: paras. 1–4The respondents relied on the 2024 order and submitted that the parties had been directed to pursue civil and criminal remedies in respect of the allegations.
Source reference: paras. 1–4Issues
1. Whether the directions in the Registrar of Societies’ order dated 19 March 2024 that required further particulars or action had been carried to their logical conclusion.
Source reference: paras. 2, 5–62. Whether further orders should be directed on the petitioners’ grievance, and within what period.
Source reference: paras. 1, 6Law Applied
The petition was brought under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a writ of mandamus.
Source reference: para. 6The Court applied the principle that where an authority has issued directions requiring further enquiry or action, those directions should be completed and appropriate final orders passed in accordance with law, after hearing the affected parties and giving them an opportunity to be heard.
Source reference: para. 6Reasoning
The Court noted that the Registrar’s 19 March 2024 order contained seven findings or directions, and that some—particularly those at Serial Nos. 4 and 7—required further action.
Source reference: paras. 5–7Since that action had not been brought to completion, and statements had again been recorded in 2025, the Court directed completion of the pending enquiry and issuance of appropriate orders.
Source reference: paras. 5–7It expressly left the truth or otherwise of the allegations undecided.
Source reference: paras. 5–7Holding
The Court disposed of the writ petition at the admission stage, directing that the further-action directions in the Registrar’s order dated 19 March 2024 be carried to their logical conclusion and that final orders, if any, be passed after hearing both sides and providing an opportunity to be heard.
The exercise was to be completed within three months from receipt of the web copy of the order.
Source reference: paras. 6–7Any independent enquiry being conducted by the Inspector General of Registration in appeal or revision was also to be completed.
Source reference: paras. 6–7No costs were awarded, and the Court made no finding on the merits of the allegations.
Source reference: paras. 6–7Original Court PDF
DR.V.GanesanvsThe Principal Secretary to the Government of Tamil
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
