CAT - Delhi

Respondents directed to decide pending representation for stepping up of pay via reasoned and speaking order.

Mrs Gladyes Sanjay Massey vs Delhi Secretariat

CAT - DelhiJUDGMENT: March 27, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant, a 64-year-old retired Senior Nursing Officer, filed an Original Application (OA) seeking the "stepping up" of her pay to match that of her junior, Ms. Anita Arora, effective from December 2016.

Source reference: para. 1

The applicant contends that as the senior employee, she is entitled to this adjustment under the relevant service rules.

Source reference: para. 1

On May 29, 2024, the applicant submitted a formal representation (Annexure A-1) to the respondents regarding this pay disparity, which remains pending.

Source reference: para. 1

At the admission stage, the applicant’s counsel requested that the Tribunal dispose of the OA by directing the respondents to decide the pending representation through a reasoned and speaking order within a set timeframe.

Source reference: para. 2

The respondents’ counsel raised no objection to this proposal.

Source reference: para. 4
02

Issues

Whether the Tribunal should direct the respondents to dispose of the applicant’s pending representation regarding the stepping up of pay at the admission stage of the OA.

Source reference: para. 2 & 5
03

Law Applied

Fundamental Rule 22 (FR 22), which provides for the "stepping up of pay" of a senior employee to match that of a junior in specific circumstances to rectify pay anomalies.

Source reference: para. 1

procedural principle of administrative exhaustion, allowing authorities to first decide on an employee’s grievance via a "reasoned and speaking order" before the court adjudicates on the merits.

Source reference: para. 5
04

Reasoning

The Tribunal opted not to delve into the substantive merits of the applicant’s claim or the potential issue of limitation (delay) regarding the 2016 pay claim.

Source reference: para. 6

Given the applicant's limited prayer for a time-bound administrative decision and the respondents' consent to this course of action, the Tribunal determined that a judicial direction for an administrative review was the most efficient resolution at this stage.

Source reference: para. 2, 4 & 5

This ensures that the executive branch first applies FR 22 to the facts of the case before further judicial intervention is required.

Source reference: para. 5
05

Holding

The Tribunal disposed of the OA at the admission stage without expressing an opinion on the merits or limitation.

The respondents are directed to decide the applicant’s representation dated May 29, 2024, by passing a reasoned and speaking order within eight weeks of receiving the certified copy of this order.

Source reference: para. 5

No costs were awarded.

Source reference: para. 7
CAT - Delhi

Original Court PDF

Mrs Gladyes Sanjay MasseyvsDelhi Secretariat

CAT - Delhi · March 27, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment