01Facts
The petitioner joined the Forest Department as a daily wager on 1 December 1980 and superannuated on 30 July 2014.
¶ 3–4.1 · pp. 2–3Although he had been granted benefits under the Government Resolutions dated 17 October 1988 and 15 September 2014, he was not granted old-pension benefits. He sought reconsideration of his service for the 240-days-per-year requirement, including Sundays and public holidays.
¶ 3–4.1 · pp. 2–3On 5 September 2024, the Court directed the State to recalculate his attendance on that basis; the State’s affidavit recorded 20 years of service and completion of ten years’ 240-day service in 1993–94.
¶ 3–4.1 · pp. 2–302Issues
i.Whether the Government Resolution dated 17 October 1988 requires a workman to complete 240 days in the first year before receiving the specified benefits, and how that 240-day period is to be calculated
¶ 7(i) · p. 7ii.Whether Sundays and public holidays may be included when calculating 240 days—including in the first year—for daily wagers claiming benefits under the Government Resolution dated 17 October 1988
¶ 7(ii) · p. 703Law Applied
Section 25-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 governs continuous service and the deemed-service calculation based on 240 days; the Court applied Workmen of American Express International Banking Corporation v. Management of American Express International Banking Corporation, (1985) 4 SCC 71, for the principle that “actually worked” includes days of employment for which wages are payable, including Sundays and paid holidays.
¶ 11.2–11.4 · pp. 12–17The Court also applied the Government Resolutions dated 17 October 1988 and 15 September 2014, as interpreted in State of Gujarat v. PWD Employees Union, (2013) 12 SCC 417, and State of Gujarat v. PWD and Forest Employees Union, (2019) 15 SCC 248: only years in which the worker completed 240 days count toward the relevant service benefits.
¶ 8–11 · pp. 8–12It relied on the Gujarat Division Bench decisions in Chhaganbhai Ranchhodbhai Rathod v. Deputy Executive Engineer and Executive Engineer v. Dhirabhai Bhurabhai Pagi for applying the inclusion of Sundays and public holidays to daily wagers claiming benefits under the 1988 Resolution.
¶ 13–14.2 · pp. 20–31Provisions in the judgment · 3
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 25Section 25F
PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972 Section 2
04Reasoning
The Court held that the 1988 Resolution does not prescribe a separate method for calculating 240 days. The method established under American Express therefore applies when assessing eligibility under that Resolution, including for daily wagers and in the first year of service.
¶ 11.1–11.5, 15 · pp. 12–17, 31–32The State’s reliance on Ranjit Natvarlal Chauhan v. Morbi Nagar Palika did not displace the earlier Gujarat Division Bench authority or the subsequent decisions affirming that Sundays and public holidays are included in the calculation.
¶ 12–14.2 · pp. 18–31Applying that approach to the attendance sheet filed by the State, the Court found that the petitioner had completed more than ten years of 240-day service by 31 March 2005, satisfying the stated requirement for old-pension benefits.
¶ 16.3 · p. 3205Holding
The Court answered that Sundays and public holidays are included in calculating the 240-day requirement under the 1988 Resolution, including for the first year, and held the petitioner entitled to old-pension benefits.
¶ 15–16.3 · pp. 31–32It allowed the petition and directed the respondents to revise the benefits under the Resolutions dated 17 October 1988 and 15 September 2014, grant old pension and the Seventh Pay Commission benefits with effect from 1 January 2016, and calculate and disburse the consequential benefits, including arrears, within 60 days of uploading the judgment.
¶ 17 · p. 33Original Court PDF
KANKABHAI KOHYABHAI KOTWALvsOFFICE OF DIRECTORATE OF PENSION AND PROVIDENT FUND
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
