Facts
The petitioner claimed ownership of properties in Natham Survey Nos. 306/2 and 306/3 at Karuppur Village under Patta No. 815, purchased by registered sale deed dated 20 October 2014. She applied to the first respondent on 25 June 2026 for a survey and demarcation, paid the prescribed fees, and sought a writ of mandamus when the application remained unconsidered.
Source reference: p. 2, para. 2The respondents’ counsel submitted that the survey had been scheduled for 6 October 2026.
Source reference: p. 3, para. 3Issues
1. Whether the respondents should be directed to act on the petitioner’s survey application and conduct a physical measurement and boundary demarcation of the properties
Source reference: p. 3, para. 52. Whether the Court should determine the merits of the petitioner’s property claim or leave any title or inter se civil-rights dispute to the competent Civil Court
Source reference: pp. 3–4, paras. 5–6Law Applied
The petition invoked the High Court’s writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The judgment cites no specific statutory survey provision or precedent.
Source reference: no citationIt directs the authorities to consider the application on its merits and in accordance with law, after giving both sides a personal hearing, and to conduct the measurement and demarcation using official Field Measurement Book records, parent title deeds, and updated revenue registers.
Source reference: p. 3, para. 5Questions of title or inter se civil rights may be pursued before the competent Civil Court.
Source reference: p. 4, para. 6Reasoning
The Court did not adjudicate ownership or the parties’ competing property claims.
Source reference: p. 3, para. 5Instead, it considered the pending survey application suitable for determination by the revenue authorities through a field exercise based on official records and relevant documents, with an opportunity for both sides to be heard.
Source reference: p. 3, para. 5It preserved the parties’ right to seek civil relief if the matter involved a dispute over title or inter se civil rights.
Source reference: p. 4, para. 6Holding
The writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the respondents to act on Application No. 2026/N123/08/007767 dated 25 June 2026, after hearing both sides, and to conduct a physical measurement and boundary demarcation of Natham Survey Nos. 306/2 and 306/3 using the specified records. The exercise was to be completed within eight weeks from receipt of a copy of the order.
The Court expressed no opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s claim and left any title or inter se civil-rights dispute to the competent Civil Court. No costs were ordered.
Source reference: pp. 3–4, paras. 5–6Original Court PDF
REGINAvsThe Tahsildar
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
