Madras High Court
Administrative and Public LawCivil Law

Revenue Authorities Must Survey and Demarcate Land After Notice, With Police Assistance If Required

Kaliyammal vs THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

Madras High CourtJUDGMENT: September 29, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Revenue Authorities Must Survey and Demarcate Land After Notice, With Police Assistance If Required. Kaliyammal vs THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR. Madras High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing the Tahsildar to survey and demarcate land measuring 3.12½ acres in Survey No. 427/1 at Mallikuttai Village, Karimangalam Taluk, based on her online application dated 2 September 2026, with police assistance.

Source reference: p. 2

She alleged that the application had not been considered by the authorities.

Source reference: p. 3

The Government Advocate submitted that it would be considered and disposed of within a time fixed by the Court.

Source reference: p. 4
02

Issues

Whether the authorities should be directed to consider the petitioner’s application and survey and demarcate the subject property.

Source reference: pp. 3–4

Whether police assistance should be provided for the survey if required.

Source reference: p. 4
03

Law Applied

The Court acted under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, exercising its writ jurisdiction to direct public authorities to consider an application and perform the requested administrative task within a specified period.

Source reference: no citation

It required prior notice to the petitioner, private respondents, and any other concerned parties before the survey.

Source reference: no citation

The Court did not cite any specific statute or precedent.

Source reference: no citation

It also stated that disputes concerning possession must be resolved through a suit before the competent Civil Court.

Source reference: p. 5
04

Reasoning

In light of the limited relief sought and the respondents’ submission that the application would be considered, the Court directed the Tahsildar and Taluk Head Surveyor to consider the application and conduct the survey and demarcation within six weeks of receiving the order, after giving prior notice to all concerned.

Source reference: p. 4

It left any question of possession to the Civil Court and made police assistance conditional on a request from the surveying authorities.

Source reference: p. 5
05

Holding

The writ petition was disposed of with a direction to respondents 2 and 3 to consider the petitioner’s application and survey and demarcate the property within six weeks, after prior notice.

If those authorities request police protection, the jurisdictional police must provide adequate assistance.

Source reference: pp. 4–5

The Court expressed no opinion on the merits and clarified that possession disputes must be brought before the competent Civil Court.

Source reference: pp. 4–5

No costs were ordered.

Source reference: pp. 4–5
Madras High Court

Original Court PDF

KaliyammalvsTHE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

Madras High Court · September 29, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment