01Facts
The petitioner, Kumari Pushpa, passed her intermediate examination from Govind Ballabh Pant Intermediate College, Khatima, a Non-Government Aided Institution
¶ 2She applied for a grant of ₹51,000 under the ‘Nanda Gaura Scheme’ pursuant to a Government Order (G.O.) dated 07.08.2023, which provides financial assistance to female students upon passing their intermediate exams
¶ 1-2The respondents returned her application on the grounds that she failed to annex a certificate of registration under the Right to Education (RTE) Act
¶ 2-3The petitioner challenged this action, asserting she was pursuing her graduation and that the RTE certificate requirement was inapplicable to her as a student of an aided institution
¶ 4, 702Issues
i.1. Whether the requirement of producing an RTE certificate under Clause 3(kha)(5) of the Nanda Gaura Scheme applies to students who graduated from Non-Government Aided Institutions
¶ 4, 10ii.2. Whether the respondents’ action of returning the petitioner's application was legally sustainable under the amended G.O. dated 10.01.2024
¶ 6, 903Law Applied
The court primarily applied the provisions of the ‘Nanda Gaura Scheme’ as defined by G.O. dated 07.08.2023 and subsequently amended by G.O. dated 10.01.2024
¶ 2, 5Under the amended Clause 3(kha)(5), the requirement to provide an RTE certificate is specifically limited to students who passed their 12th standard from private schools (ICSE/CBSE) and were originally admitted to those private schools under the RTE quota up to the 8th standard
¶ 5, 10For students from government or government-aided institutions, the scheme requires proof of passing the examination and evidence of admission into a graduation or diploma course
¶ 504Reasoning
The court examined the amended Clause 3(kha)(5) of the G.O. dated 10.01.2024, noting that the petitioner submitted her application on the very day the amendment was issued
¶ 5-6The court found that the petitioner undisputedly passed her intermediate from a Non-Government Aided Institution and was currently pursuing a degree at Khatima Degree College
¶ 4, 7Upon reviewing the text of the amendment, the court determined that the RTE certificate requirement was explicitly restricted to students of private schools
¶ 10The State Counsel conceded that the requirement was intended only for private school students
¶ 8Consequently, the court reasoned that the competent authority misapplied the G.O. by demanding an RTE certificate from a student of an aided institution, rendering the rejection of her application illegal and unsustainable
¶ 9-1005Holding
The Court allowed the writ petition, holding that the RTE certificate requirement is inapplicable to students passing from government-aided institutions
¶ 10-11The court quashed the oral/implied rejection and directed the petitioner to resubmit her application for the ₹51,000 grant within 15 days
¶ 11The respondents were ordered to consider the application strictly in accordance with the G.O. dated 10.01.2024
¶ 11No order as to costs was made
¶ 12Original Court PDF
KUMARI PUSHPAvsSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
