Chhattisgarh High Court
Administrative and Public LawCivil Procedure and Evidence

RTI penalty requires a categorical finding of deliberate and mala fide information withholding.

SHYAM LAL DANSENA vs CHHATTISGARH STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: September 08, 20261 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
RTI penalty requires a categorical finding of deliberate and mala fide information withholding.. SHYAM LAL DANSENA vs CHHATTISGARH STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioner, a Public Information Officer, challenged the order dated 16 February 2024 passed by the Chhattisgarh State Information Commission in Second Appeal Case No. A/565/2021/Raigarh.

Source reference: paras. 1–5

By that order, the Commission imposed a penalty of ₹25,000 on the petitioner under Section 20(1) of the Right to Information Act, 2005, allegedly for failing to provide the information sought by Respondent No. 4 within the prescribed period.

Source reference: paras. 1–5

The petitioner contended that any delay was neither deliberate nor mala fide.

Source reference: paras. 1–5
02

Acts & Sections Cited

2 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Right to Information Act, 20052

Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

SHYAM LAL DANSENAvsCHHATTISGARH STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION

Chhattisgarh High Court · September 08, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment