Karnataka High Court
Transport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Law

Salary and unpaid-leave records justify enhanced compensation for income lost during the recovery period.

SRI. RUDRESH. B. M. vs SMT. SHOBHA

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: September 28, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Salary and unpaid-leave records justify enhanced compensation for income lost during the recovery period.. SRI. RUDRESH. B. M. vs SMT. SHOBHA. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The claimant sustained a trimalleolar fracture of the left ankle in a road accident on 9 March 2024, allegedly caused by the negligent driving of a Bolero car.

Source reference: paras. 3, 7

He worked as a screen printer and delivery boy and claimed compensation for his injuries.

Source reference: paras. 3, 7

The MACT awarded him Rs. 3,06,181, including Rs. 1,32,000 for loss of income during an eight-month laid-up period, assessed at monthly income of Rs. 16,500.

Source reference: para. 3

The claimant appealed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement.

Source reference: p. 2; para. 1
02

Issues

Whether the compensation for loss of income during the laid-up period should be enhanced in light of the claimant’s salary certificate and evidence of unpaid leave.

Source reference: para. 10

Whether the compensation for loss of amenities and future unhappiness was adequate given the injury sustained.

Source reference: para. 8
03

Law Applied

The appeal was brought under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which provides for an appeal against an award of the Claims Tribunal.

Source reference: p. 2

The Court applied an evidence-based assessment of compensation: the claimant’s established monthly salary and the period of unpaid leave were relevant to calculating loss of income, while the nature of the injury informed the assessment of compensation for loss of amenities.

Source reference: paras. 8, 10

The judgment cites no specific precedent or further statutory rule.

Source reference: no citation
04

Reasoning

The Court accepted the salary certificate showing consolidated monthly pay of Rs. 20,000 and the evidence that the claimant took eight months’ leave without pay.

Source reference: para. 10

It therefore assessed loss of income at Rs. 1,60,000 for the eight-month period, rather than the Tribunal’s Rs. 1,32,000.

Source reference: para. 10

Considering the ankle fracture, it also increased compensation for loss of amenities from Rs. 50,000 to Rs. 70,000.

Source reference: para. 8

It left the awards for pain and suffering, medical expenses, and attendant, conveyance and nourishment charges unchanged.

Source reference: paras. 8–9
05

Holding

The appeal was allowed in part.

The claimant was awarded an additional Rs. 48,000—Rs. 28,000 for loss of income and Rs. 20,000 for loss of amenities—with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the claim petition until realisation.

Source reference: paras. 11–12

The insurer was directed to deposit the enhanced amount with interest within six weeks, and the claimant was entitled to release of the entire enhanced compensation.

Source reference: para. 12
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Motor Vehicles Act, 19881

Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

SRI. RUDRESH. B. M.vsSMT. SHOBHA

Karnataka High Court · September 28, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment