Facts
The applicant, a Postal Assistant, challenged the respondents’ re-fixation of his pay and recovery of amounts from his salary. He alleged that recovery began in August 2026 without a show-cause notice. Although he had submitted a representation on 21 August 2026, it remained pending. He sought refund of the recovered amount and an interim direction against further recovery.
Source reference: p. 2At the hearing, he requested that the respondents be directed to issue notice, hear him, and refrain from further recovery in the meantime. The respondents stated that they were prepared to act according to the rules.
Source reference: pp. 2–3Issues
Whether the respondents could continue recovering amounts from the applicant’s salary without first issuing a show-cause notice and providing an opportunity to be heard.
Source reference: pp. 2–3Whether the respondents should be directed to decide the matter by a reasoned and speaking order and suspend further recovery until that decision was communicated.
Source reference: p. 3Law Applied
The Tribunal proceeded under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, pursuant to which the applicant had brought the original application.
Source reference: p. 2It applied the procedural requirement, stated in the order, that the applicant be given notice and an opportunity of hearing before the respondents took action on the recovery issue, and that their decision be communicated through a reasoned and speaking order.
Source reference: p. 3Reasoning
The Tribunal noted that no show-cause notice had been issued before recovery began.
Source reference: p. 3In light of that procedural omission, and the applicant’s request for an opportunity to respond, it directed the respondents to issue notice, provide a hearing, and communicate a reasoned decision within three weeks of receiving the order. To preserve the position while that process was pending, it directed that no further recovery be made until the speaking order was communicated.
Source reference: p. 3Holding
The Tribunal disposed of the original application at the admission stage, without costs.
It directed the respondents to issue a show-cause notice, provide the applicant an opportunity to be heard, and communicate a reasoned and speaking order within three weeks of receiving the order. Further recovery from the applicant’s salary was barred until that order was communicated.
Source reference: p. 3Acts & Sections Cited
1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
Administrative Tribunals Act, 19851
Original Court PDF
PINAKI MANDALvsPOSTS
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
![Salary recovery must cease pending a show-cause notice, hearing, and reasoned decision.. PINAKI MANDAL vs POSTS. CAT - ['Kolkata']. LawLens](/stories/thumbnails/salary-recovery-must-cease-pending-a-show-cause-notice-hearing-and-reasoned-decision-8e43527e42d24a23a03bc7606fcc612c.webp)