01Facts
The Petitioner, a registered unrecognized political party, filed a writ petition seeking to quash the Election Commission of India's (ECI) order dated 31.01.2026, which rejected its application for the allotment of a common symbol for the upcoming general elections
¶ 1The Petitioner argued that the rejection was based on a misconceived interpretation of Paragraph 10B of the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968, and that they were denied an opportunity to cure procedural defects
¶ 2The ECI contended that the Petitioner had already availed the symbol concession twice and failed to secure the mandatory 1% of total votes in the 2021 Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly Elections, thereby disqualifying them from a third concession
¶ 302Issues
i.Whether a registered unrecognized political party is entitled to the allotment of a common symbol for a third time under Paragraph 10B of the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968, if it fails to meet the minimum vote percentage criteria in previous elections
¶ 4-603Law Applied
The Court primarily applied Paragraph 10B of the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968
¶ 4Under Explanation (i) to Para 10B, the concession of a common symbol is available to a registered unrecognized party for any two general elections
¶ 5Under Explanation (ii), a party seeking the concession for a third or subsequent time is eligible only if the votes polled by its candidates in the previous election were not less than 1% of the total valid votes polled in that State
¶ 604Reasoning
The Court analyzed the eligibility criteria set forth in the Explanations to Para 10B(B).
It noted that the Petitioner had already contested two earlier general elections using a common symbol
¶ 5Consequently, the Petitioner's eligibility for a third allotment was strictly governed by Explanation (ii), which mandates a minimum 1% vote share in the preceding election
¶ 6Since the Petitioner admittedly secured less than 1% of the votes in the last two general elections, the Court reasoned that the mandatory statutory condition for a subsequent concession remained unfulfilled
¶ 6-7The Court held that the Petitioner had no legal right to demand the symbol given this non-compliance
¶ 705Holding
The High Court dismissed the writ petition, holding that the Petitioner failed to satisfy the requirement of Paragraph 10B of the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968
¶ 8The Court clarified that while the party could not claim a "common symbol" as a right, its individual candidates remained free to apply for "free symbols" from the Returning Officer under Paragraph 12 of the same Order
¶ 8No costs were awarded.
Original Court PDF
DESIYA MAKKAL SAKTHI KATCHIvsElection Commission of India
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
