Facts
During the pendency of a recovery suit filed by Respondent No. 1 (Varsha) and arbitral proceedings initiated by Intervenor-Masyc against the Corporate Debtor, the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) was initiated against the Corporate Debtor.
Source reference: no citationThe Resolution Plan submitted by the Appellant (Tata Steel Ltd.) was subsequently approved by the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT).
Source reference: no citationIssues
1. Whether claims that were sub-judice at the time of approval of a Resolution Plan, but not formally submitted or crystallized during the CIRP, can be pursued against the successful resolution applicant.
Source reference: no citation2. Whether the 'clean slate doctrine' under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) extinguishes all past liabilities not included in the approved Resolution Plan.
Source reference: no citationLaw Applied
Section 31 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, provides that once a resolution plan is approved, it is binding on the corporate debtor, its employees, members, creditors, and other stakeholders.
Source reference: no citationThe "Clean Slate Doctrine" as established in Committee of Creditors of Essar Steel India Limited v. Satish Kumar Gupta ensures that the successful resolution applicant starts on a fresh slate without being burdened by "undecided" claims.
Source reference: no citationReasoning
The court reasoned that the legislative intent of the IBC is to ensure the resuscitation of the Corporate Debtor. Allowing sub-judice claims to survive the approval of a Resolution Plan would result in 'hydra-headed' monsters popping up, jeopardizing the commercial calculations of the Resolution Applicant.
Source reference: no citationThe court interpreted that all claims which were not part of the approved Resolution Plan stand extinguished, as a Successful Resolution Applicant cannot be faced with surprise claims relating to the period prior to the commencement of the CIRP.
Source reference: no citationHolding
Claims that have not been crystallized and were not part of the approved Resolution Plan are extinguished.
The appeals were allowed, and the sub-judice claims initiated by the Respondents were held to be no longer maintainable against the Appellant under the clean slate doctrine.
Source reference: no citationOriginal Court PDF
M/S Tata Steel Ltd.vsVarsha
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in