Facts
The petitioner challenged the second respondent’s order dated 3 October 2026 rejecting his request to conduct an Adal Padal programme during the Arulmighu Shri Ayyanar Swamy and Shri Alagunachi Amman Temple Festival at Sithanenthal Village on 7 October 2026.
Source reference: p. 1He sought permission and adequate police protection for the event.
Source reference: p. 1The matter was heard by the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court on 6 October 2026.
Source reference: p. 2Issues
Whether the rejection order dated 3 October 2026 should be quashed and permission granted for the proposed Adal Padal programme.
Source reference: pp. 1–2Whether the programme should be subject to conditions governing its content, duration, and conduct.
Source reference: pp. 2–4Law Applied
The Court referred to two circulars issued by the Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu—Rc.No.159539/Crime.4(3)/2018, signed on 31 October 2018, and Rc.007301/GenlI(1)/2019, dated 9 April 2019—which contain instructions to Inspectors of Police concerning applications for permission to conduct cultural programmes.
Source reference: p. 2The order cites no statute or judicial precedent.
Source reference: pp. 2–4Reasoning
Having noted the DGP circulars governing consideration of cultural-programme applications, the Court quashed the rejection order and allowed the event subject to detailed safeguards.
Source reference: p. 2These conditions required the programme to be relevant to the temple or festival, end by 10 p.m., avoid obscene or undignified portrayals, double-meaning songs, alcohol, political or divisive content, and ensure that public harmony was not affected.
Source reference: pp. 2–4The Court also made organisers responsible for compliance and permitted the authorities to impose further conditions based on ground realities.
Source reference: p. 4Holding
The Court quashed the second respondent’s rejection order dated 3 October 2026 and allowed the writ petition.
The Court permitted the Adal Padal programme on 7 October 2026 from 7 p.m. until no later than 10 p.m., subject to the stated conditions.
Source reference: pp. 2–4The order granted permission for the programme but did not expressly direct the respondents to provide adequate police protection.
Source reference: pp. 2–4Original Court PDF
MarimuthuvsThe Superintendent of Police
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
