Madras High Court
Administrative and Public LawReligious and Personal Law

Temple festival adal padal program permitted subject to safeguards and a 10 p.m. cutoff.

Marimuthu vs The Superintendent of Police

Madras High CourtJUDGMENT: October 06, 20261 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Temple festival adal padal program permitted subject to safeguards and a 10 p.m. cutoff.. Marimuthu vs The Superintendent of Police. Madras High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioner challenged the second respondent’s order dated 3 October 2026 rejecting his request to conduct an Adal Padal programme during the Arulmighu Shri Ayyanar Swamy and Shri Alagunachi Amman Temple Festival at Sithanenthal Village on 7 October 2026.

Source reference: p. 1

He sought permission and adequate police protection for the event.

Source reference: p. 1

The matter was heard by the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court on 6 October 2026.

Source reference: p. 2
02

Issues

Whether the rejection order dated 3 October 2026 should be quashed and permission granted for the proposed Adal Padal programme.

Source reference: pp. 1–2

Whether the programme should be subject to conditions governing its content, duration, and conduct.

Source reference: pp. 2–4
03

Law Applied

The Court referred to two circulars issued by the Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu—Rc.No.159539/Crime.4(3)/2018, signed on 31 October 2018, and Rc.007301/GenlI(1)/2019, dated 9 April 2019—which contain instructions to Inspectors of Police concerning applications for permission to conduct cultural programmes.

Source reference: p. 2

The order cites no statute or judicial precedent.

Source reference: pp. 2–4
04

Reasoning

Having noted the DGP circulars governing consideration of cultural-programme applications, the Court quashed the rejection order and allowed the event subject to detailed safeguards.

Source reference: p. 2

These conditions required the programme to be relevant to the temple or festival, end by 10 p.m., avoid obscene or undignified portrayals, double-meaning songs, alcohol, political or divisive content, and ensure that public harmony was not affected.

Source reference: pp. 2–4

The Court also made organisers responsible for compliance and permitted the authorities to impose further conditions based on ground realities.

Source reference: p. 4
05

Holding

The Court quashed the second respondent’s rejection order dated 3 October 2026 and allowed the writ petition.

The Court permitted the Adal Padal programme on 7 October 2026 from 7 p.m. until no later than 10 p.m., subject to the stated conditions.

Source reference: pp. 2–4

The order granted permission for the programme but did not expressly direct the respondents to provide adequate police protection.

Source reference: pp. 2–4
Madras High Court

Original Court PDF

MarimuthuvsThe Superintendent of Police

Madras High Court · October 06, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment