Madras High Court
Administrative and Public LawConstitutional Law

Temple-festival drama is permitted subject to safeguards and a strict 10 p.m. limit.

B.Muthu Irulan vs The Superintendent of Police

Madras High CourtJUDGMENT: October 13, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Temple-festival drama is permitted subject to safeguards and a strict 10 p.m. limit.. B.Muthu Irulan vs The Superintendent of Police. Madras High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioner challenged the Inspector of Police’s order dated 3 October 2026 refusing permission to conduct a “Nadagam” on 20 and 21 October 2026 as part of the Purattasi Pongal festival at Sree Santhana Mariamman Temple, Sithalagundu Village.

Source reference: p.1

He sought quashing of that order and permission, with police protection, to hold the event

Source reference: p.1

The Court was informed of two Director General of Police circulars—dated 31 October 2018 and 9 April 2019—containing instructions for considering applications to conduct cultural programmes.

Source reference: p.2
02

Issues

Whether the Inspector of Police’s order refusing permission to conduct the Nadagam should be quashed

Source reference: p.1

Whether the petitioner should be permitted to conduct the Nadagam subject to conditions governing the event

Source reference: pp.2–4
03

Law Applied

The Court referred to the Director General of Police’s circulars Rc.No.159539/Crime.4(3)/2018, signed on 31 October 2018, and Rc.007301/GenlI(1)/2019, dated 9 April 2019, which provide instructions to police inspectors for considering applications to conduct cultural programmes.

Source reference: p.2

The Court stated no statutory provision or judicial precedent as the basis for its decision

Source reference: pp.2–4
04

Reasoning

Having been apprised of the DGP circulars, the Court quashed the refusal and allowed the petition, permitting the event subject to specified safeguards.

Source reference: pp.2–3

These included limiting performances to culturally relevant material, prohibiting obscene or undignified portrayals and double-meaning songs, ending the programme by 10 p.m., and prohibiting political or divisive content and alcohol.

Source reference: pp.3–4

The Court also authorised the police to stop a programme that exceeded the permitted time and made organisers responsible for compliance and any untoward incidents.

Source reference: p.4
05

Holding

The Court quashed the Inspector of Police’s order dated 3 October 2026 and allowed the writ petition.

It permitted the petitioner to conduct the Nadagam on 20 and 21 October 2026, from 8 p.m. to 10 p.m., subject to the listed conditions and any other conditions imposed by the competent authority.

Source reference: pp.2–4

The Court stated that action under law could be taken for violations

Source reference: pp.2–4
Madras High Court

Original Court PDF

B.Muthu IrulanvsThe Superintendent of Police

Madras High Court · October 13, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment