01Facts
The petitioner was allotted a Tamil Nadu Housing Board flat under the Self Finance Scheme and stated that she had paid the entire sale consideration; an agreement for sale was executed on 31 October 2023.
pp. 2–3When she sought execution of the sale deed, the Board required her to pay an additional 5% GST of Rs. 5,15,450 as a condition of execution.
p. 3She sought execution without that payment, subject to the outcome of pending writ appeals concerning the Board’s additional GST demand.
pp. 3–4The Division Bench had directed the Board to execute sale deeds for eligible allottees without insisting on the additional GST, subject to the outcome of those appeals.
pp. 5–602Issues
i.1. Whether the respondents could insist on payment of the disputed additional 5% GST as a condition for executing the petitioner’s sale deed, despite the Division Bench’s interim directions.
p. 7ii.2. Whether the petitioner’s sale deed should be executed subject to the outcome of the pending writ appeals.
pp. 6–703Law Applied
The Division Bench’s order dated 28 August 2025 in W.A. Nos. 2565 of 2025 etc. directed the Tamil Nadu Housing Board to execute sale deeds for otherwise eligible allottees without demanding the additional 5% GST, subject to the outcome of the appeals.
pp. 5–6If the Board ultimately succeeds and the additional GST is held payable, the allottees who obtain deeds under that arrangement must pay it; any refund claim by allottees who have already paid the additional amount was to await the appeal outcome.
pp. 5–6The judgment applied this interim arrangement; it identified no statutory provision as an independent basis for decision.
pp. 5–604Reasoning
The petitioner’s challenge concerned the same additional GST demand addressed by the Division Bench’s order.
pp. 6–7As the petitioner sought execution without payment and undertook to abide by the appeals’ outcome, the Court applied that order and directed execution without insisting on the disputed amount. The direction remained conditional on the final decision in the pending appeals.
pp. 6–705Holding
The writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the respondents to execute the sale deed in the petitioner’s favour without demanding the additional 5% GST, subject to the outcome of the pending writ appeals.
p. 7Any refund claim was to await the outcome of those appeals.
p. 7No costs were awarded.
p. 7Original Court PDF
R.MALINIvsTHE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
