Madhya Pradesh High Court
Transport, Maritime, and Aviation LawAdministrative and Public Law

Transport authority must decide temporary permit applications under Section 87(1)(c) within ten days.

Grikaet Society Its Unit Dps Delhi Public School vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High CourtJUDGMENT: September 29, 20261 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Transport authority must decide temporary permit applications under Section 87(1)(c) within ten days.. Grikaet Society Its Unit Dps Delhi Public School vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh. Madhya Pradesh High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioner applied for a temporary stage carriage permit for an educational vehicle transporting children between their homes and Delhi Public School. The application remained undecided, and the petitioner sought a direction requiring Respondent No. 2 to consider it under Section 87(1)(c) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

Source reference: p.1, para. 2

The State did not oppose that limited request.

Source reference: p.2, para. 3
02

Issues

Whether Respondent No. 2 should be directed to consider and decide the petitioner’s pending application for a temporary permit under Section 87(1)(c) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

Source reference: p.1, para. 2; p.3, para. 6
03

Law Applied

Section 87(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 empowers a Regional or State Transport Authority to grant a temporary permit, without following the procedure under Section 80, for a period not exceeding four months; Section 87(1)(c) covers a permit needed “to meet a particular temporary need”.

Source reference: p.2, para. 5

A Madhya Pradesh Government circular dated 4 June 2014 directs that applications for temporary permits be decided within 10 days.

Source reference: p.2, para. 4
04

Reasoning

The petitioner sought only a time-bound decision on its pending application, and the State raised no objection to that request.

Source reference: p.1, para. 2; p.2, para. 3

In directing consideration, the Court required Respondent No. 2 to take account of Section 87(1)(c) and decide the application in accordance with law; it did not determine whether the petitioner qualified for a permit.

Source reference: p.3, paras. 6, 8
05

Holding

The petition was disposed of with a direction to Respondent No. 2 to decide the petitioner’s pending representation within 10 days of receiving a certified copy of the order and communicate the outcome to the petitioner.

The petitioner may not ply the vehicle unless and until a permit is granted, and the Court expressed no opinion on the merits.

Source reference: p.3, para. 7; p.4, para. 8
06

Acts & Sections Cited

6 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Original Court PDF

Grikaet Society Its Unit Dps Delhi Public SchoolvsThe State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · September 29, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment