Chhattisgarh High Court

Tribunals must examine medical experts or constitute Medical Boards to verify disability certificates before dismissing compensation claims.

ASHOK BHATIA vs MANGESH KUMAR SALAME

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: April 08, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The legal representatives of the original claimant, Anjana Bhatiya, appealed against the award dated 23.10.2018 passed by the Additional Claims Tribunal Dongargarh in Claim Case No. 17/2017

Source reference: para. 1

The Tribunal had dismissed the claim application for compensation on the grounds that the doctor who issued the permanent disability certificate was not examined

Source reference: para. 1-2

Although a disability certificate (Ex. P-15) was produced, the Tribunal found no merit in the claim due to the lack of medical testimony

Source reference: para. 1, 6
02

Issues

1. Whether the Claims Tribunal was justified in dismissing the claim for compensation on the sole ground that the doctor/Medical Board members who issued the disability certificate were not examined

Source reference: para. 6
03

Law Applied

The Court primarily relied on the precedent established by the Supreme Court in Raj Kumar v. Ajay Kumar & Another (2011) 1 SCC 343

Source reference: para. 2, 5

This principle mandates that while a disability certificate is not proof of disability unless the treating or assessing doctor is produced for cross-examination, the Tribunal must act with caution

Source reference: para. 5

If the Tribunal is dissatisfied with the medical evidence produced, it has the power and duty to constitute a Medical Board to assess the claimant's disability rather than summarily dismissing the claim

Source reference: para. 5
04

Reasoning

The High Court observed that while the appellants filed a disability certificate (Ex. P-15), the Doctors or Members of the Medical Board were indeed not examined

Source reference: para. 6

However, the Court reasoned that per the Raj Kumar guidelines, the Tribunal erred by dismissing the application outright

Source reference: para. 6

Instead of dismissal, the Tribunal ought to have constituted a Medical Board to verify and prove the medical certificate

Source reference: para. 6

The Court found that the finding of non-entitlement to compensation was unsustainable because the procedural safeguard of referring the claimant to a Medical Board—available to the Tribunal when medical evidence is deemed insufficient—was not utilized

Source reference: para. 6
05

Holding

The High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the finding of non-entitlement in the impugned award dated 23.10.2018

The Court held that the matter must be remitted to the Claims Tribunal for fresh consideration

Source reference: para. 6

The Tribunal was directed to examine the Doctors/Members of the Medical Board to prove the disability certificate (Ex. P-15) and allow the claimants to produce further evidence

Source reference: para. 6

The Tribunal is ordered to pass a new award within four months of receiving the case record

Source reference: para. 6
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

ASHOK BHATIAvsMANGESH KUMAR SALAME

Chhattisgarh High Court · April 08, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment