Facts
The legal representatives of the original claimant, Anjana Bhatiya, appealed against the award dated 23.10.2018 passed by the Additional Claims Tribunal Dongargarh in Claim Case No. 17/2017
Source reference: para. 1The Tribunal had dismissed the claim application for compensation on the grounds that the doctor who issued the permanent disability certificate was not examined
Source reference: para. 1-2Although a disability certificate (Ex. P-15) was produced, the Tribunal found no merit in the claim due to the lack of medical testimony
Source reference: para. 1, 6Issues
1. Whether the Claims Tribunal was justified in dismissing the claim for compensation on the sole ground that the doctor/Medical Board members who issued the disability certificate were not examined
Source reference: para. 6Law Applied
The Court primarily relied on the precedent established by the Supreme Court in Raj Kumar v. Ajay Kumar & Another (2011) 1 SCC 343
Source reference: para. 2, 5This principle mandates that while a disability certificate is not proof of disability unless the treating or assessing doctor is produced for cross-examination, the Tribunal must act with caution
Source reference: para. 5If the Tribunal is dissatisfied with the medical evidence produced, it has the power and duty to constitute a Medical Board to assess the claimant's disability rather than summarily dismissing the claim
Source reference: para. 5Reasoning
The High Court observed that while the appellants filed a disability certificate (Ex. P-15), the Doctors or Members of the Medical Board were indeed not examined
Source reference: para. 6However, the Court reasoned that per the Raj Kumar guidelines, the Tribunal erred by dismissing the application outright
Source reference: para. 6Instead of dismissal, the Tribunal ought to have constituted a Medical Board to verify and prove the medical certificate
Source reference: para. 6The Court found that the finding of non-entitlement to compensation was unsustainable because the procedural safeguard of referring the claimant to a Medical Board—available to the Tribunal when medical evidence is deemed insufficient—was not utilized
Source reference: para. 6Holding
The High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the finding of non-entitlement in the impugned award dated 23.10.2018
The Court held that the matter must be remitted to the Claims Tribunal for fresh consideration
Source reference: para. 6The Tribunal was directed to examine the Doctors/Members of the Medical Board to prove the disability certificate (Ex. P-15) and allow the claimants to produce further evidence
Source reference: para. 6The Tribunal is ordered to pass a new award within four months of receiving the case record
Source reference: para. 6Original Court PDF
ASHOK BHATIAvsMANGESH KUMAR SALAME
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in