01Facts
The petitioners, arrayed as accused Nos. 7 and 13, sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in Special C.C. No. 1047 of 2026, arising from Crime No. 84 of 2025.
pp. 3–6The prosecution alleged that, on 22 September 2025, the petitioners and other accused abducted and assaulted two victims, threatened them, and demanded ₹50,000; the victims sustained simple injuries.
pp. 3–6The FIR was lodged on 24 September 2025.
pp. 3–6After the Karnataka Control of Organised Crimes Act, 2000 (KCOCA) was invoked, a charge sheet was filed against 15 persons.
pp. 3–6The petitioners’ bail application before the Special Court was rejected on 14 July 2026.
pp. 3–6The State noted the petitioners’ criminal antecedents, while the petitioners relied on the fact that similarly placed accused had been granted bail.
pp. 6–702Issues
i.1. Whether the petitioners were entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, notwithstanding the allegations, invocation of KCOCA, and their criminal antecedents.
pp. 3, 6–7ii.2. Whether the grant of bail to similarly placed co-accused supported granting bail to the petitioners.
p. 703Law Applied
The Court considered the petition under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023, which provides for the High Court’s and Court of Session’s power to grant bail.
pp. 3–4The prosecution included offences under Sections 118(1), 189(2), 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 140(2), 351(2), 352, 61(2), 308(3) and 190 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and Sections 3(1)(ii), 3(4) and 3(3) of KCOCA.
pp. 3–4The order identifies no precedent or specific statutory test for bail under KCOCA; its stated considerations were the nature of the allegations, the injuries, completion of the investigation, and parity with co-accused.
pp. 5–7Provisions in the judgment · 13 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 439
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 10 provisions
Section 189Section 191Section 115Section 118Section 140Section 351Section 352Section 61Section 308Section 190KARNATAKA CONTROL OF ORGANIZED CRIMES ACTS, 2000 Section 3
04Reasoning
The Court weighed the allegations against the circumstances that both victims had sustained only simple injuries, the FIR was lodged nearly two days after the incident, and the investigation had concluded with the filing of the charge sheet.
pp. 5–6Although the State pointed to the petitioners’ criminal antecedents and KCOCA had been invoked on that basis, the Court also noted that other accused facing similar allegations and having criminal antecedents had been granted bail by the Trial Court.
pp. 6–7Considering these factors together, it held that the petitioners’ request for bail should be allowed, subject to conditions.
p. 705Holding
The Court allowed both criminal petitions and directed that the petitioners be released on bail in Special C.C. No. 1047 of 2026, subject to conditions.
pp. 7–8Each petitioner must execute a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties for the like sum; attend trial unless exempted; refrain from threatening or tampering with witnesses and from similar offences; remain within the Trial Court’s jurisdiction without permission; and report to Jayanagar Police Station on the first Sunday of each month, between 10:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m., for one year from release.
pp. 8–9Original Court PDF
MUSTAFA ALI BAIGvsSTATE OF KARNATAKA
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
